%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<<
/Names 2 0 R
/Type/Catalog
/Outlines 3 0 R
/PageLabels 4 0 R
/OpenAction[5 0 R/FitH 1123]
/Metadata 6 0 R
/Pages 7 0 R
>>
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Dests 9 0 R
>>
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/First 10 0 R
/Last 10 0 R
/Count 1
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Nums[0 11 0 R]
>>
endobj
5 0 obj
<<
/Type/Page
/Contents[12 0 R 13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R]
/Resources 22 0 R
/MediaBox[0 0 493.228 700.157]
/Parent 7 0 R
/Rotate 0
/Annots[23 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R 42 0 R 43 0 R 44 0 R]
/CropBox[0 0 493.228 700.157]
/Group
<<
/CS/DeviceRGB
/S/Transparency
>>
>>
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Length 1978
/Subtype/XML
/Type/Metadata
>>
stream
application/pdf
DSJ_2000021 1..22
Not for further distribution unless allowed by the License or with the express written permission of Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.21
Universitetsbibliotek Agder
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. Universitetsbibliotek Agder, on 12 Nov 2020 at 12:56:55, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
2020-09-22T17:45:17+05:01
CUP
2020-09-22T17:45:36+05:01
2020-11-12T12:56:55+00:00
Acrobat Distiller 10.0.0 (Windows)
uuid:cd018fe5-b153-42e1-9402-9e325fef4841
uuid:6c2a6c34-8a5f-4eea-a0d6-32ef39160bf7
endstream
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Count 23
/Kids[578 0 R 5 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R 86 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R]
/Type/Pages
>>
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Creator(CUP)
/ModDate(D:20240329123613+00'00')
/Title(Supporting designers: moving from method menagerie to method ecosystem)
/Producer(PDFsharp 1.50.5147 \(www.pdfsharp.com\) \(Original: Universitetsbibliotek Agder\))
/CreationDate(D:20200922174517+05'30')
/Author(Gericke, K., Eckert, C., Campean, F. et al)
/Keywords()
/Subject(Supporting designers is one of the main motivations for design research. However, there is an ongoing debate about the ability of design research to transfer its results, which are often provided in form of design methods, into practice. This article takes the position that the transfer of design methods alone is not an appropriate indicator for assessing the impact of design research by discussing alternative pathways for impacting design practice. Impact is created by different means - first of all through the students that are trained based on the research results including design methods and tools and by the systematic way of thinking they acquired that comes along with being involved with research in this area. Despite having a considerable impact on practice, this article takes the position that the transfer of methods can be improved by moving from cultivating method menageries to facilitating the evolution of method ecosystems. It explains what is understood by a method ecosystem and discusses implications for developing future design methods and for improving existing methods. This paper takes the position that efforts on improving and maturing existing design methods should be raised to satisfy the needs of designers and to truly support them.)
>>
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Kids[45 0 R 46 0 R]
>>
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/Parent 3 0 R
/Dest
/Last 47 0 R
/Title
/First 48 0 R
/Count -6
>>
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/S/D
>>
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Filter/FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Length 5983
/Filter/FlateDecode
>>
stream
HdWMoϯ#uTw |L cML%R ^UuWUwm="1m55d{^e|yX>=Rֻ=[=st'wEV[\K[q=}ElUzOq\k[\IWJI,KvURB;tk-}[,m=Z^
6.A @ %n94o
m@&Hph[2? !o_YIjbhWSRTㄣCq?@K$G G
mু3B\ m&ˠ_O`9LШ\
:.>&U.J%>.i!:
ElVo8lۮ}ylqqAr\|'IlgOoV2EKRq)[}@*o|wXEiV A("
o&W9nP2|jKߐ7hSd^W ;Mli\xx H(v~^X;CoMH#-+ 㶧K?BF@^Ǹn/[Z [T.u%(oPOp߾#x#~iTwꗨQ5,!v!U=U;6@9ؒHL@0Бc!shh<
f&j