Mismatch Between Scales of Knowledge in Nepalese Forestry: Epistemology, Power, and Policy Implications
Journal article, 2012

The importance of scale dynamics and scale mismatches for outcomes of natural resource management has been widely discussed. In this article we develop theoretically the concept of ‘knowledge scales’ and illustrate it through empirical examples. We define scales of knowledge as the temporal and spatial extent and character of knowledge held by individuals and collectives, and argue that disparate scales of knowledge are an important ‘scale mismatch,’ which together with scale politics, lead to conflicts in Nepalese forest management. We reveal how there are multiple positions within local knowledge systems and how these positions emerge through people’s use of and relations to the forest, in a dynamic interaction between the natural environment and relations of power such as gender, literacy, and caste. Nepalese forestry is a realm in which power and scales of knowledge are being coproduced in community forestry, at the interface of material and symbolic practices in use of forest resources, and in contestations of social-political relations. Further, we reflect upon the importance of clear and precise use of scale concepts and present a methodological approach using triangulation for divergence, enabling researchers and practitioners involved in natural resource management to reveal scale mismatches and politics.

Nepal

natural resource management

power

scale

community forestry

knowledge scales

Author

Helene Ahlborg

Chalmers, Energy and Environment, Environmental Systems Analysis

Andrea J. Nightingale

University of Gothenburg

University of Edinburgh

Ecology and Society

17083087 (eISSN)

Vol. 17 4

Subject Categories

Philosophy

Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Environmental Sciences

DOI

10.5751/ES-05171-170416

More information

Latest update

2/28/2018