Wickedness and the anatomy of complexity
Journal article, 2018

Traditional scientific policy approaches and tools are increasingly seen as inadequate, or even counter-productive, for many purposes. In response to these shortcomings, a new wave of approaches has emerged based on the idea that societal systems are irreducibly complex. The new categories that are thereby introduced – like “complex” or “wicked” – suffer, however, by a lack of shared understanding. We here aim to reduce this confusion by developing a meta-ontological map of types of systems that have the potential to “overwhelm us”: characteristic types of problems, attributions of function, manners of design and governance, and generating and maintaining processes and phenomena. This permits us, in a new way, to outline an inner anatomy of the motley collection of system types that we tend to call “complex”. Wicked problems here emerge as the product of an ontologically distinct and describable type of system that blends dynamical and organizational complexity. The framework is intended to provide systematic meta-theoretical support for approaching complexity and wickedness in policy and design. We also points to a potential causal connection between innovation and wickedness as a basis for further theoretical improvement.

Future

Complexity

Sustainability

Sociotechnical systems

Wicked problems

Innovation

Author

Claes Andersson

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

Petter Törnberg

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

University of Amsterdam

Futures

0016-3287 (ISSN)

Vol. 95 118-138

Driving Forces

Sustainable development

Innovation and entrepreneurship

Subject Categories

Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified

Roots

Basic sciences

DOI

10.1016/j.futures.2017.11.001

More information

Latest update

3/6/2018 9