Learning and decision-making in artificial animals
Journal article, 2018

A computational model for artificial animals (animats) interacting with real or artificial
ecosystems is presented. All animats use the same mechanisms for learning and decisionmaking.
Each animat has its own set of needs and its own memory structure that undergoes
continuous development and constitutes the basis for decision-making. The decision-making
mechanism aims at keeping the needs of the animat as satisfied as possible for as long
as possible. Reward and punishment are defined in terms of changes to the level of need
satisfaction. The learning mechanisms are driven by prediction error relating to reward and
punishment and are of two kinds: multi-objective local Q-learning and structural learning
that alter the architecture of the memory structures by adding and removing nodes.
The animat model has the following key properties: (1) autonomy: it operates in a fully
automatic fashion, without any need for interaction with human engineers. In particular, it
does not depend on human engineers to provide goals, tasks, or seed knowledge. Still, it can
operate either with or without human interaction; (2) generality: it uses the same learning
and decision-making mechanisms in all environments, e.g. desert environments and forest
environments and for all animats, e.g. frog animats and bee animats; and (3) adequacy:
it is able to learn basic forms of animal skills such as eating, drinking, locomotion, and
navigation.
Eight experiments are presented. The results obtained indicate that (i) dynamic
memory structures are strictly more powerful than static; (ii) it is possible to use a
fixed generic design to model basic cognitive processes of a wide range of animals and
environments; and (iii) the animat framework enables a uniform and gradual approach to
AGI, by successively taking on more challenging problems in the form of broader and more
complex classes of environments.

animats

local Q-learning

homeostatic decision-making

structural learning

Author

Claes Strannegård

Chalmers, Computer Science and Engineering (Chalmers), Data Science

Bas Steunebrink

IDSIA (Dalle Molle Institute for Artificial Intelligence)

David Lindström

University of Gothenburg

Nils Lars Svangård

Cognition and Communication

Joscha Bach

Harvard University

Journal of Artificial General Intelligence

Vol. 9 1 55-82

Subject Categories

Computer and Information Science

More information

Latest update

1/15/2019