On the introduction of a community resilience framework to Social Life Cycle Assessment
Paper in proceedings, 2020

SLCA according to the UNEP/SETAC guidelines attempt to measure the social impacts of a product or policy with human well-being as endpoint indicator. However, the methodological sheets do not provide clear and unambiguous definition of what human well-being is and are lacking with regard to a weak capacity to identify reliable indicators to include in both Type I and Type 2 impact assessment. The aim of this article is to explore the chance to introduce ‘community resilience’ (e.g. Magis 2013) as new topic for assessment in the SLCA, compared to human well-being (Soltanpour et al., 2019). The concept of community resilience is investigated via literature to understand how it can be related to ‘human well-being’ expressed in the guidelines and how it can be operationalized for impact assessment. Results will show the possibility of community resilience assessment in SLCA for both Type I and Type 2 assessment.

Life Cycle Assessment

Social sustainability

Methodological development


Giulia Goffetti

University of Siena

Henrikke Baumann

Chalmers, Technology Management and Economics, Environmental Systems Analysis

Collection FruiTrop thema Social LCA

2426-9654 (ISSN)

Vol. 5 172-174

7th international conference on Social Life Cycle Assessment
Göteborg, Sweden,

Driving Forces

Sustainable development

Subject Categories

Other Agricultural Sciences not elsewhere specified

Social and Economic Geography

Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use

Environmental Management

Other Social Sciences

More information

Latest update