Performance indicators for measuring the effects of Smart Maintenance
Journal article, 2020
Design/methodology/approach – Intercoder reliability and negotiated agreement were used to analyse 170 maintenance PIs. The PIs were structurally categorised according to the anticipated effects of Smart Maintenance.
Findings – Companies need to revise their set of PIs when changing manufacturing and/or maintenance strategy (e.g. reshape the maintenance organisation towards Smart Maintenance). This paper suggests 13 categories of PIs to facilitate the selection of PIs for Smart Maintenance. The categories are based on 170 PIs, which were analysed according to the anticipated effects of Smart Maintenance.
Practical implications – The 13 suggested categories bring clarity to the measuring potential of the PIs and their relation to the Smart Maintenance concept. Thereby, this paper serves as a guide for industry practitioners to select PIs for measuring the effects of Smart Maintenance.
Originality/value – This is the first study evaluating how maintenance PIs measure the anticipated effects of maintenance in digitalised manufacturing. The methods intercoder reliability and negotiated agreement were used to ensure the trustworthiness of the categorisation of PIs. Such methods are rare in maintenance research.
Smart maintenance
Maintenance
KPI
Performance indicators
Manufacturing
Author
Camilla Lundgren
Chalmers, Industrial and Materials Science, Production Systems
Jon Bokrantz
Chalmers, Industrial and Materials Science, Production Systems
Anders Skoogh
Chalmers, Industrial and Materials Science, Production Systems
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
1741-0401 (ISSN)
Vol. 70 6 1291-1316SMASh – Smart Maintenance Assessment
VINNOVA, 2017-05-01 -- 2019-10-31.
Subject Categories
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Areas of Advance
Production
DOI
10.1108/IJPPM-03-2019-0129