Investment decision model for CO2 utilization projects: An empirical study on CO2 mineralization curing
Journal article, 2025

The investment decision of CO2 utilization projects faces complexity arising from sunk costs, return uncertainty, timing flexibility, and divergent sub-technology learning rates. Existing research largely focuses on single-dimensional uncertainty analysis, which fails to adequately address the combined effects of technological, carbon price, and market uncertainties, leading to potentially inaccurate investment valuations. To address this limitation, this study proposes an integrated analytic framework that integrates a component-based technological learning model with a trinomial tree model and Geometric Brownian Motion, which can simultaneously capture the dynamics of carbon and product prices, and account for heterogeneous learning rates across key technological components, and determine the optimal project investment timing under uncertainty. Applying this framework to a carbonation-cured concrete case study reveals an optimal investment window before 2040, empirical results show that under a high learning scenario,.the operational cost of emerging components decreases by up to 46.2 %, higher than that of other mature components. CCU product price volatility increases the critical carbon price, while a positive drift rate significantly reduces the investment threshold, though its impact diminishes beyond a drift rate of 0.05. Ultimately, the real options model generates a valuation premium of up to ¥6.1 billion compared to the static NPV, validating the value of deferred flexibility. Investment timing analysis reveals a delay of 3–4 years under volatility and exhibits a non-monotonic shift with increasing drift. This method provides quantitative guidance for low-carbon technology investment under uncertainty.

CO2 utilization technology

CO2 mineralization

Trinomial tree model

Real option method

Component technology learning method

Author

Yi Zhuo Ji

Beijing Institute of Technology

Basic Science Center for Energy and Climate Change

Beijing Laboratory for System Engineering of Carbon Neutrality

Jia Ning Kang

Beijing Institute of Technology

Basic Science Center for Energy and Climate Change

Beijing Laboratory for System Engineering of Carbon Neutrality

Lan Cui Liu

Beijing Normal University

Xiao Xi Tian

Beijing Laboratory for System Engineering of Carbon Neutrality

Beijing Institute of Technology

Basic Science Center for Energy and Climate Change

Yunlong Zhang

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

Beijing Institute of Technology

Yi-Ming Wei

Basic Science Center for Energy and Climate Change

Beijing Laboratory for System Engineering of Carbon Neutrality

Beijing Institute of Technology

Applied Energy

0306-2619 (ISSN) 18729118 (eISSN)

Vol. 401 Part B 126699

Subject Categories (SSIF 2025)

Economics

DOI

10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126699

More information

Latest update

9/12/2025