Evaluating numerical simulation accuracy for full-scale high-strength steel ship structures: Insights from the ISSC 2025 Ultimate Strength Committee benchmark on transversely stiffened panels
Journal article, 2026

The demand for sustainable ship design has driven the use of high-strength steel to reduce structural weight, although this introduces buckling challenges due to unchanged elastic properties. Supported by the ISSC 2025 Ultimate Strength Committee, this study evaluated the ability of numerical simulations to predict the nonlinear response and ultimate strength of stiffened panels subjected to transverse compression. The benchmark consisted of full-scale blinded experimental tests that were conducted in parallel using a deck-like structure with thin plating prone to elastic buckling. The finite element models produced by participating researchers were compared, focusing on the complete end-shortening curve rather than just ultimate strength. Despite identical input geometry and minimal modeling guidance, results varied widely, revealing the significant influence of user-defined assumptions. The inclusion of additional data on material properties in the second study phase led to greater result dispersion due to the different strategies adopted for the hardening model. Key variability sources included the modeling of initial imperfections, material constitutive laws, and residual stresses from welding. The study highlights the need for consistent modeling and improved experimental data collection, particularly regarding boundary conditions and residual stress effects. While including welding stresses improved stiffness predictions, uncertainty in boundary behavior limited the assessment of ultimate strength impacts. The study also evaluated compliance with classification society rules (e.g., CSR, DNV, UR-S35), offering insights into how nonlinear numerical analyses complement or challenge regulatory frameworks based on closed-form expressions. Recommendations are made for improving simulation reliability and result validation.

Regulatory compliance

Ultimate strength assessment

Buckling criteria

Finite element analysis benchmarking

Experimental validation

Author

Marco Gaiotti

University of Genoa

Lars Brubak

Det Norske Veritas (DNV Norway)

Bai-Qiao Chen

University of Lisbon

Ionel Darie

DNV Germany SV

Dimitris Georgiadis

Technical University of Munich

Daisuke Shiomitsu

ClassNK

Mihkel Kõrgesaar

Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech)

Yining Lv

China Classification Society (CCS)

Ken Nahshon

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division

Marcelo Paredes

Texas A&M University

Jani Romanoff

Aalto University

Ingrid Shipperen

Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO)

Akira Tatsumi

Osaka University

Murilo Augusto Vaz

Federal University of Rio de Janeiro

Yikun Wang

Lloyd's Register

Albert Zamarin

University of Rijeka

Zhihu Zhan

China Classification Society (CCS)

Jonas Ringsberg

Chalmers, Mechanics and Maritime Sciences (M2), Marine Technology

Marine Structures

0951-8339 (ISSN)

Vol. 106 1-14 103966

Subject Categories (SSIF 2025)

Metallurgy and Metallic Materials

Vehicle and Aerospace Engineering

Applied Mechanics

Driving Forces

Sustainable development

Innovation and entrepreneurship

Areas of Advance

Transport

Materials Science

Roots

Basic sciences

DOI

10.1016/j.marstruc.2025.103966

More information

Latest update

11/12/2025