Fracture toughness of cemented carbides: Testing method and microstructural effects
Journal article, 2015

Fracture toughness is one the most important parameters for design applications and performance assessment of WC-Co cemented carbides (hardmetals). Different from hardness, fracture toughness is commonly a property more difficult to evaluate, particularly in brittle materials. A large number of different testing methods have been introduced to evaluate toughness of hardmetals, but in general all of them have either theoretically debatable issues or important experimental difficulties. In this study, three different fracture toughness testing methodologies are investigated: three-point bending on Chevron notched specimen ("reference" baseline), Palmqvist indentation test, and Hertzian indentation method. The work is conducted in several cemented carbide grades with different microstructures, in terms of both WC grain size and Co binder content. It is found that Chevron-notched three-point bending test yields suitable fracture toughness values for a wide range of cemented carbide grades with varying hardness. Concerning indentation methods, the Hertzian one may be particularly recommended, as compared to Palmqvist method, as far as hardness (HV30) drops below 1300. On the other hand, if HV30 is higher than 1300 Palmqvist indentation procedure yields reliable fracture toughness measurements. Experimental findings are finally analyzed and discussed on the basis of two theoretical models proposed in the literature.

Microstructural characterization

Fracture toughness

Author

Saad Ahmed Sheikh

Chalmers, Materials and Manufacturing Technology, Surface and Microstructure Engineering

R. M'Saoubi

Seco Tools AB

P. Flasar

M. Schwind

Seco Tools AB

T. Persson

Seco Tools AB

J. Yang

Polytechnic University of Catalonia

L. Llanes

Polytechnic University of Catalonia

International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials

02634368 (ISSN) 22133917 (eISSN)

Vol. 49 1 153-160

Subject Categories

Materials Engineering

DOI

10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2014.08.018

More information

Latest update

1/3/2024 9