Analyzing past and future energy industry contractions: Towards a better understanding of the flip-side of energy transitions
Meeting the 2°C climate target requires a massive transformation of energy systems involving both the growth of "new" technologies (e.g. wind power) and phase-out of "old" ones (e.g. use of coal). But closing down energy industries is a painful socio-political process that can lead to job losses, economic difficulties, and political tensions. Even in Germany, with its ambitious climate strategies, attempts to close coal mines are facing public protests. However, much more scientific effort has gone into researching the expansion of new energy technologies than the phase-out of "old" ones.
This project closes this research gap by identifying and quantifying historical cases of energy industry contractions as well as their socio-political preconditions and implications. How frequently and under what conditions do energy industries contract? What types of policies make energy industry contractions less painful? We will also quantify contraction rates in future energy scenarios, including those under climate policies. How do these projected rates of contraction compare to historical precedents? Is the required contraction realistic? How can it be made less painful?
Jessica Jewell (contact)
Assistant Professor at Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory
University of Bergen
The research council of Norway
Funding Chalmers participation during 2019–2021
Related Areas of Advance and Infrastructure
Areas of Advance