EVALUATING THE THORACIC RESPONSE IN A HUMAN BODY MODEL, COMPARED TO CADAVER EXPERIMENTS
Other conference contribution, 2011
Fatalities caused by car accidents accounted for 1.2 million worldwide in 2004. Chest
injuries are the second death cause, after head injuries, in vehicle accidents. Devices to
predict risk of injury are fundamental to develop and evaluate restraint systems that can
mitigate the injury severity and reduce the fatalities. This can be achieved with
mathematical Human Body Models (HBM). An HBM needs to be biofidelic, both in terms
of size and biomechanical response. Herein, the biofidelity of the thorax region in an HBM
is evaluated. The evaluation focuses on whole body kinematics and chest response during
frontal car accidents.
Finite element simulations with an HBM were performed with the code LS-DYNA [1].
A modified version of Total HUman Model for Safety v3.0 (THUMS) [2] has been the basis
for the work presented here. THUMS was modified to improve its robustness and
numerical stability. The meshes of the rib cage, skin around the ribcage, and intercostal
muscles were refined. THUMS represents a 50th percentile male and has approximately
150,000 elements. It was compared with cadaver pendulum impacts [3], table top tests [4],
and sled tests [5]. The pendulum test consist of a cylinder with diameter 125 mm, mass of
23.4 kg and an initial speed of 4.3 m/s impacting on the middle of the sternum. The table
top tests included four loading conditions of the chest: hub, diagonal belt, double diagonal
belt, and distributed load. The sled test was performed at 40 km/h, using a three point
standard seat belt.
The model has been compared to cadaver experiments on different load cases, which
are representative of modern automotive restraint systems. In general, THUMS showed a
good agreement with the experimental corridors for the pendulum and table top tests. The
chest response in the sled test differed for the lower chest, possibly due to the absence of
biofidelic fracture simulations in the THUMS. After comparing the kinematic and dynamic
responses of THUMS with cadaver experiments it was concluded that the model is
adequate to simulate the human response under frontal impacts. The next step is to identify
parameters that can predict the risk of rib fracture and then become a tool to evaluate new
restraint systems.