Trade-Off between the Social and Environmental Performance of Green Concrete: The Case of 6 Countries
Journal article, 2018
performance can be financially beneficial for enterprises. Through the investigation of the sustainability hotspots and impacts, concerning social and environmental, of the steel slag mixed concrete (green concrete) the study assessed the factors relevant for its performance and examined how to improve them. Hotspot analysis and impact assessments were conducted by social and environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). The assessed green concrete represented not just the variety of geographic representation but also the product designs (three different slag contents) and the potential difference occurring from the corporate efforts, where four classes were introduced. The investigation of the social and environmental hotspots of the green concrete revealed a difference in the relation between the sustainability performance and steel slags. While the increased slag content resulted in worse social performance, the increase improved the environmental performance in all six investigated case countries. This trade-off between the social and environmental performance implied the limits of the sustainable product design and suggested the effectiveness of the supply chain management for improving the two sustainability performances for the green concrete.
life cycle thinking
social life cycle assessment
construction industry
SLCA
alternative cement
LCT
building materials
life cycle assessment
Author
Jun Kono
Chalmers, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Technology
York Ostermeyer
Chalmers, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Technology
Holger Wallbaum
Chalmers, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Technology
Sustainability
20711050 (eISSN)
Vol. 10 7 2309Driving Forces
Sustainable development
Innovation and entrepreneurship
Subject Categories
Materials Engineering
Civil Engineering
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Business Administration
Areas of Advance
Building Futures (2010-2018)
Energy
DOI
10.3390/su10072309