Techno-Economic Assessment of Chemical Looping Gasification of Biomass for Fischer-Tropsch Crude Production with Net-Negative CO2 Emissions: Part 2
Journal article, 2022

This work presents a techno-economic analysis of a used as the primary gasification process for biofuel production through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS). Two different gas cleaning process configurations, cold-gas cleanup and hot-gas cleanup process trains, are explored, along with off-gas utilization possibilities, to study their influence on the process economics of an integrated CLG-FT process plant. Off-gas recirculation to increase Fischer-Tropsch (FT) crude production has a significant influence on reducing the levelized production costs for FT crude. The results indicate that the specific production cost estimated for a CLG-FT plant with a hot-gas cleanup train is roughly 10% lower than the case with a cold-gas cleanup train, while the total plant costs remain relatively the same for all plant configurations. In addition to this, the former has a considerably higher overall system energy efficiency of 63%, roughly 18% more than the latter, considering the co-production of FT crude, district heating, and electricity. The specific investment costs range from 1.5 to 1.7 M euro 2018/MWLHV, and the specific FT crude production cost ranges from 120 to 147 euro 2018/MWhFT. Roughly 60% of total carbon fed to the process is captured, enabling net-negative CO2 emissions. A CO2 price for negative emissions would significantly reduce the specific fuel production costs and would, hence, be competitive with fossil-based liquid fuels.

Author

Tharun Roshan Kumar

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Energy Technology

Tobias Mattisson

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Energy Technology

Magnus Rydén

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Energy Technology

Energy & Fuels

0887-0624 (ISSN) 1520-5029 (eISSN)

Vol. 36 17 9706-9718

Driving Forces

Sustainable development

Areas of Advance

Energy

Subject Categories

Chemical Process Engineering

Other Environmental Engineering

Bioenergy

DOI

10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c01184

More information

Latest update

7/27/2024