Sampling marine pore waters for Mn, Fe, U, Re and Mo: Modifications on diffusional equilibration thin film gel probes

Journal article, 2003

Pore water metal profiles are important for identifying redox horizons and understanding trace metal geochemical cycling. The challenges of pore water sampling for trace metals are minimizing disturbance, especially at the sediment–water interface, and minimizing oxidation during sampling. We are investigating diffusional equilibration in thin films (DET) probes for obtaining pore water profiles. Our goal is to use probes for redox-sensitive trace metals U, Re and Mo, in addition to Mn and Fe, in coastal marine areas. Initial solution equilibration tests and laboratory core incubation experiments suggest that equilibration times for probes in sediments are approximately 24–48 h. Control tests suggest that the incubation does not alter the redox conditions in the pore waters. Pore water profiles from cores sampled by slicing, centrifuging and filtering (in a nitrogen atmosphere) and from probes are similar. Two modifications on the gel probe design were tested to determine their impact. (1) PVC wedges were attached to the backs of probes to increase the contact between sediments and the probe surface and to reduce the risk of forming channels along the probe surface, which might allow vertical pore water transport. Lower Fe concentrations were measured from probes without PVC wedges, but other metal profiles were similar. (2) A modified face frame was removed from the front of a probe, to reduce disturbance of the sediments during insertion and to increase the contact between the sediments and probe surface. Probes with modified face frames did not have increasing U and Mo concentrations with depth, whereas two of the three probes without face frames did have increasing concentrations. Increasing U and Mo concentrations at depth may be reflecting the influence of irrigating burrows and their supply of oxygen to reduced sediments, which could oxidize previously reduced metals. The distribution of burrows is heterogeneous and resulting profiles would also be expected to be heterogeneous in their response. Differences between probe profiles and sliced/centrifuged profiles are examined to gain insight into possible sampling artifacts. Peaks in the Re sliced/centrifuged profiles suggest a large Re flux to the overlying waters, which is neither calculated from probe profiles nor measured in benthic chamber samples. It is possible that heterogeneity at the sampling site in Buzzards Bay resulted in these differences; however, it is also possible that centrifugation releases Re from pore structures that would not be measured with less intrusive sampling methods, such as gel probes or benthic chambers.