Making dinner in an uncomfortable future: Comparing provocations as user insight elicitation methods
Paper in proceeding, 2022

To aid the transition to a renewable energy future, user-centred designers need to design for a future with limits perceived as uncomfortable to users. This paper explores whether methods borrowed from critical and speculative design can elicit actionable insights to aid such designers. A comparative analysis is performed of the insights gained from two studies, using a provotype and speculative enactment respectively to situate the participants in a speculative, uncomfortable, distant future. The two methods do allow elicitation of rich and deep insights surrounding values, latent needs, and tacit knowledge, but with slightly different emphasis regarding content, temporal scope, and reflective depth. However, the implementation of the methods failed to provoke the participants to question their prioritisations and views on societal development, maybe related to an inability to provoke enough.

renewable energy systems

speculative enactment

user insight

provocative design

Author

Karin Nilsson

Chalmers, Industrial and Materials Science, Design & Human Factors

Sara Renström

Chalmers, Industrial and Materials Science, Design and Human Factors

Helena Strömberg

Chalmers, Industrial and Materials Science, Design & Human Factors

Sofie Groth

Student at Chalmers

DRS2022: Bilbao

2398-3132 (ISSN)


978-1-91229-457-2 (ISBN)

DRS2022
Bilbao, Spain,

Designing Everyday Energy Resilience

HSB Living Lab, 2019-12-01 -- 2022-04-15.

Swedish Energy Agency (49807-1), 2019-12-01 -- 2021-12-31.

Driving Forces

Sustainable development

Subject Categories

Design

Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Other Engineering and Technologies not elsewhere specified

Areas of Advance

Energy

DOI

10.21606/drs.2022.647

More information

Latest update

2/24/2023