Trustworthy AI in the public sector: An empirical analysis of a Swedish labor market decision-support system
Journal article, 2024
Our analysis shows that while AI promises enhanced decision-making efficiency, the reality is marred by issues of transparency, interpretability, and stakeholder engagement. The opacity of the neural network used by the agency to assess jobseekers’ need for support and the lack of comprehensive technical understanding among PES management contribute to the challenges in achieving transparent and interpretable AI systems. Economic pressures for efficiency often overshadow the need for ethical considerations and stakeholder involvement, leading to decisions that may not be in the best interest of jobseekers.
We propose recommendations for enhancing AI's trustworthiness in public services, emphasizing the importance of stakeholder engagement, particularly involving jobseekers in the decision-making process. Our study advocates for a more nuanced balance between the use of advanced AI technologies and the leveraging of internal resources such as skilled personnel and organizational knowledge. We also highlight the need for improved AI literacy among both management and personnel to effectively navigate AI's integration into public decision-making processes.
Our findings contribute to the ongoing debate on trustworthy AI, offering a detailed case study that bridges the gap between theoretical exploration and practical application. By scrutinizing the AI implementation in the Swedish PES, we provide valuable insights and guidelines for other public sector organizations grappling with the integration of AI into their decision-making processes.
Artificial intelligence
public employment services
trustworthy AI
decision-support systems
Author
Karl de Fine Licht
Chalmers, Technology Management and Economics, Science, Technology and Society
Alexander Berman
University of Gothenburg
Vanja Carlsson
University of Gothenburg
Technology in Society
0160-791X (ISSN)
Vol. 76 102471Areas of Advance
Information and Communication Technology
Subject Categories
Ethics
Public Administration Studies
Driving Forces
Sustainable development
Innovation and entrepreneurship
DOI
10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102471