Comparing the simulated influence of biomass burning plumes on low-level clouds over the southeastern Atlantic under varying smoke conditions
Journal article, 2024

Biomass burning plumes are frequently transported over the southeast Atlantic (SEA) stratocumulus deck during the southern African fire season (June-October). The plumes bring large amounts of absorbing aerosols and enhanced moisture, which can trigger a rich set of aerosol-cloud-radiation interactions with climatic consequences that are still poorly understood. We use large-eddy simulation (LES) to explore and disentangle the individual impacts of aerosols and moisture on the underlying stratocumulus clouds, the marine boundary layer (MBL) evolution, and the stratocumulus-to-cumulus transition (SCT) for three different meteorological situations over the southeast Atlantic during August 2017. For all three cases, our LES shows that the SCT is driven by increased sea surface temperatures and cloud-top entrainment as the air is advected towards the Equator. In the LES model, aerosol indirect effects, including impacts on drizzle production, have a small influence on the modeled cloud evolution and SCT, even when aerosol concentrations are lowered to background concentrations. In contrast, local semi-direct effects, i.e., aerosol absorption of solar radiation in the MBL, cause a reduction in cloud cover that can lead to a speed-up of the SCT, in particular during the daytime and during broken cloud conditions, especially in highly polluted situations. The largest impact on the radiative budget comes from aerosol impacts on cloud albedo: the plume with absorbing aerosols produces a total average 3 d of simulations. We find that the moisture accompanying the aerosol plume produces an additional cooling effect that is about as large as the total aerosol radiative effect. Overall, there is still a large uncertainty associated with the radiative and cloud evolution effects of biomass burning aerosols. A comparison between different models in a common framework, combined with constraints from in situ observations, could help to reduce the uncertainty.

Author

Alejandro Baró Pérez

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Michael S. Diamond

Florida State Univ, Dept Earth Ocean & Atmospher Sci

Frida A. -M. Bender

Bolin Ctr Climate Res

Stockholm University

Abhay Devasthale

SMHI

Matthias Schwarz

GeoSphere Austria

Juha Tonttila

Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU)

Harri Kokkola

Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)

Hyunho Lee

Kongju Natl Univ

David Painemal

NASA Langley Research Center

Annica M. L. Ekman

Bolin Ctr Climate Res

Stockholm University

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

1680-7316 (ISSN) 1680-7324 (eISSN)

Vol. 24 8 4591-4610

ModElling the Regional and Global Earth system (MERGE)

Lund University (9945095), 2010-01-01 -- .

Subject Categories

Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences

DOI

10.5194/acp-24-4591-2024

More information

Latest update

10/11/2024