Holistic assessment of ship scrubbers, with emphasis on the marine environment
Doctoral thesis, 2024
As shipping can trigger change in environmental state which may cause negative impact on both the environment and human welfare, there is a need to get a complete perspective of the environmental impacts associated to ship activities. The DAPSIR framework offers a structured approach to assess the cause-effect relationship of society (Drivers, Pressures), environment and human welfare (State, Impact) and policy (Response). The overall aim of this thesis is to assess pressures, changes in environmental state and impacts on the marine environment following the wide-scale use of scrubbers, an aftertreatment technology to reduce sulphur oxide emissions to the atmosphere by spraying the exhaust with (sea)water, producing large volumes of heavily acidified and contaminated water that is discharged to the marine environment.
The results show that, in comparison to the use of distillate fuels, ships running on residual heavy fuel oil with a scrubber have much higher emissions of metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Paper I) and the discharge of scrubber water can result in one of the largest anthropogenic pressures of certain metals and PAHs on the marine environment (Paper II). When multiple shipping activities are included in the impact assessment, results show that three out of four ports are subject to unacceptable cumulative environmental risk and that scrubber water discharge and leakage of copper from antifouling paint have the largest contribution (Paper III). By applying computational models to fill the experimental ecotoxicological data gap, the risk and impact assessment of substances commonly found in scrubber water could be extended. Examples of substances, previously unaccounted for, are alkylated PAHs that show substantial contribution to the toxicity and environmental risk associated to scrubber water (Paper IV). The economic perspective shows strong economic incentive to install scrubbers, with potentially high socio-economic costs related to the discharge of hazardous substances in scrubber water discharge (Paper V).
It is possible to quantitatively assess activity, pressure and state, while extending the analysis to impact is a challenging task. Despite the challenges, the results from this thesis show that the use of scrubbers is not a sustainable technology and that the use of scrubbers could favour lock-ins in unsustainable patterns of development, enabling the continued use of residual heavy fuel oil.
ship pollution
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
scrubbers
DAPSIR
metals
marine environment
Author
Anna Lunde Hermansson
Chalmers, Mechanics and Maritime Sciences (M2), Maritime Studies
Strong economic incentives of ship scrubbers promoting pollution
Nature Sustainability,;Vol. 7(2024)p. 812-822
Journal article
Cumulative environmental risk assessment of metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from ship activities in ports
Marine Pollution Bulletin,;Vol. 189(2023)
Journal article
Metal and PAH loads from ships and boats, relative other sources, in the Baltic Sea
Marine Pollution Bulletin,;Vol. 182(2022)
Journal article
Comparing emissions of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and metals from marine fuels and scrubbers
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,;Vol. 97(2021)
Journal article
Lunde Hermansson, A., Gustavsson, M., Hassellöv, I.-M., Svedberg, P., García-Gómez, E., Gros, M., & Ytreberg, E. Combining ecotoxicological tests with Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models to predict the toxicity of scrubber water.
The results show that the use of scrubbers, and a continued use of dirtier residual fuels, will result in more contaminants being emitted and discharged as compared to the use of distillate fuels. Compared to other ship waste streams, scrubbers are the largest contributors to contaminant load and pose the largest environmental risk in port environments. Scrubber water have been likened to a toxic cocktail, but all components of this complex mixture are yet to be discovered. For some of the substances that have been identified, little is known about their toxic effects on marine organisms. Models have shown to be helpful tools when investigating the toxicity of scrubber water but, despite extended analysis, scrubber water has proved to be more toxic than current models suggest. From an economic perspective there is a strong incentive to install scrubbers, and most shipping companies have recouped the cost and are now benefiting from the continued use of dirtier fuel. The results show a clear conflict, where private economic interests come at the expense of the marine environment.
Dilution is not the solution to pollution.
Evaluation, control and Mitigation of the EnviRonmental impacts of shippinG Emissions (EMERGE)
European Commission (EC) (EC/H2020/874990), 2020-02-01 -- 2024-01-31.
Review on scrubber discharge water and hybrid fuels, derivation of an indicator for copper in marine sediments and expert support at ICES WG SHIP
The Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (grant agreement No 474-21), 2021-03-15 -- 2021-12-31.
Samhällsekonomisk analys av sjöfartens samlade belastning på havsmiljön (SHIPCOST)
Swedish Transport Administration (2023/33753), 2024-01-01 -- 2027-02-12.
EXIT - Externa kostnader, styrmedel och kostnadseffektiva åtgärder för att nå en hållbar sjöfart
Swedish Transport Administration (TRV2021/12071), 2022-02-01 -- 2025-01-31.
Sustainable shipping
The Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, 2020-04-01 -- 2020-12-31.
Förbättrad kunskap om utsläpp av farliga ämnen från sjöfarten i Ospar-regionen (Nordostatlanten)
The Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (Dnr2024-001031), 2024-06-01 -- 2025-10-31.
Driving Forces
Sustainable development
Areas of Advance
Transport
Energy
Subject Categories
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Other Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Environmental Management
Vehicle Engineering
Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources
Environmental Sciences
ISBN
978-91-8103-076-1
Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola. Ny serie: 5534
Publisher
Chalmers
Lecture hall KE, Kemigården 4, Chalmers Campus Johanneberg
Opponent: Professor Leo Posthuma, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) and Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands