Probing sulphur chemistry in oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch stars with ALMA
Journal article, 2025

Context. Sulphur and its isotopic ratios play a crucial role in our understanding of the physical properties of astrophysical environments; in particular, providing key insights into nucleosynthesis, interstellar medium processes, star formation, planetary system evolution, and galactic chemical evolution. Aims. We aim to investigate the distribution of sulphur species - SO2 34SO2, SO, and 34SO - towards a sample of five oxygen-rich asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars, along with measurements of excitation temperature, column density, and isotopic ratios. Methods. We used ALMA Band 6, 7, and 8 data of o Ceti, R Dor, W Hya, R Leo, and EP Aqr. SO234SO2, SO, and 34SO were detected towards AGB stars using the CASSIS software. To estimate the gas temperature and column density of these species, we applied the rotational diagram method (when applicable) and the Markov chain Monte Carlo method, assuming local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE). Finally, line imaging of different transitions was performed to infer the distributions of the detected sulphur-bearing species in our sample. Results. The measured excitation temperatures of SO2 for our sample sources range from ∼200 to 600 K, with estimated column densities in the range of 1-7 × 1016 cm−2. The excitation temperatures estimated using 34SO2 are comparable or slightly lower, while the column densities are about an order of magnitude lower than those of SO2. Our measured 32S/34S ratios for R Dor and W Hya are close to the solar value; however, the measured value for o Ceti is slightly higher, and the measured values for EP Aqr and R Leo are lower. Finally, spatial analysis shows that most detected lines appear as centralized emissions. Moreover, the high excitation transitions of SO2 show compact emission and probe hot gas of the inner region circumstellar envelopes (CSEs), whereas low-excitation transitions trace slightly extended structures. However, we find some differences in the emission of detected species across our sample. Conclusions. The excitation temperature of the observed regions of the CSE can be probed using the SO2 molecule. The morphological correlation between SO and SO2 emissions suggests that they are chemically linked. Differences in the emission distributions of the detected species across our sample of low mass-loss rate AGB stars such as (i) centralized emission towards o Ceti with irregular emission shapes, (ii) centralized emission with ordered circular features towards R Leo and W Hya, (iii) clumpy emission features in R Dor, and (iv) unresolved emission in Ep Aqr may arise from several factors, i.e. the physical conditions of the sources (e.g. density and temperature structures of the CSEs), source multiplicity, outflows, rotation, or other associated physical processes such as thermal and nonthermal desorption, the effects of UV photons and cosmic rays, and finally the resolution of our observations. Nonetheless, the predominantly centralized distributions of SO and SO2 in our sample support previous findings for low mass-loss rate AGB stars. Our measured 32S/34S ratios for the two stars R Dor and W Hya agree well with solar values within uncertainties, indicating that these ratios likely reflect the isotopic composition of the stars’ natal clouds and deviate for three stars (o Ceti, R Leo, and EP Aqr), which could be due to the metallicity and/or excitation conditions within various sources.

astrochemistry

stars: abundances

circumstellar matter

instrumentation: interferometers

line: identification

stars: AGB and post-AGB

Author

Prasanta Gorai

University of Oslo

M. Saberi

University of Oslo

Theo Khouri

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Astronomy and Plasmaphysics

Taissa Danilovich

KU Leuven

Monash University

Astronomy and Astrophysics

0004-6361 (ISSN) 1432-0746 (eISSN)

Vol. 704 A31

Subject Categories (SSIF 2025)

Atom and Molecular Physics and Optics

Fusion, Plasma and Space Physics

Astronomy, Astrophysics, and Cosmology

DOI

10.1051/0004-6361/202555994

More information

Latest update

12/16/2025