A practical guide to the implementation of AI in orthopaedic research-Part 4: Prerequisites for a successful orthopedics AI-driven project in terms of interdisciplinary collaboration, data management, ethical approval and technology
Review article, 2026

Translating artificial intelligence (AI) research in orthopedics from proof-of-concept studies into production-grade clinical systems requires the systematic satisfaction of four prerequisite domains: interdisciplinary team architecture, technical data management, ethical and regulatory governance and production-grade technology and deployment infrastructure. Despite a tenfold increase in orthopedic AI publications, fewer than 6% of studies reach routine clinical deployment, reflecting persistent gaps in each of these domains. This article provides a technically rigorous, evidence-based framework organized around these four pillars. The interdisciplinary team may be structured using a product-centric topology that decouples stream-aligned clinical teams from platform infrastructure teams, following Huffman et al.'s six-step AI project lifecycle: obtain/curate/label data; establish a reference standard; develop the model; evaluate performance; externally validate and iteratively reinforce until clinical implementation is viable. Data management requires data extraction protocols, integration for bulk exports and a multi-component de-identification pipeline. A multi-stage Institutional Review Board framework governs ethical oversight, scaling from Exempt review for retrospective de-identified studies to Full Board Review with prospective validation and mandatory human-override mechanisms for interventional deployment. Responsible clinical deployment requires a multi-layer Clinical Machine Learning Operations framework, implementing privacy-preserving deployment, clinical observability, compliance audit trails and human-in-the-loop governance. Model drift has to be monitored with a degradation threshold triggering mandatory human review. Level of Evidence: Level V.

collaboration

management

structure

artificial intelligence

Author

Umile Giuseppe Longo

Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma

Campus Bio Medico University Hospital

Mario Merone

Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma

Emiliano Schena

Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma

Campus Bio Medico University Hospital

Benedetta Bandini

Campus Bio Medico University Hospital

Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma

Guido Nicodemi

Campus Bio Medico University Hospital

Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma

Bálint Zsidai

University of Gothenburg

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Ann Sophie Hilkert

Chalmers, Computer Science and Engineering (Chalmers), Interaction Design and Software Engineering

University of Gothenburg

Eric Hamrin Senorski

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

University of Gothenburg

Sportrehab Sports Medicine Clinic

Alberto Grassi

IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna

University of Gothenburg

Christophe Ley

University of Luxembourg

Elmar Herbst

Division of General Internal Medicine

Michael T. Hirschmann

Canton Hospital Basel-Land

Sebastian Kopf

Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane

Romain Seil

Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg

Thomas Tischer

University of Rostock

Robert Feldt

University of Gothenburg

Kristian Samuelsson

University of Gothenburg

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Felix C. Oettl

University of Zürich

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics

2197-1153 (eISSN)

Vol. 13 3 e70863

Subject Categories (SSIF 2025)

Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Orthopaedics

Artificial Intelligence

DOI

10.1002/jeo2.70863

PubMed

42524305

More information

Latest update

8/3/2026 2