Influence of rigid and non-rigid variation simulations when assessing perceived quality of split-lines
Journal article, 2014

Non-nominal visualisation is used to evaluate how geometrical variation influences the appearance of split-lines between components on a car body. Depending on the simulation method, visualised variation can be represented in an unrealistic manner, which can affect the perception of the result. This paper presents a comparative study in which eye-tracking equipment has been used in order to explore whether the interpretation of variation differs between rigid- and non-rigid-based variation simulations during the evaluation of visualised models. Subjects from the automotive industry were asked to evaluate two virtual models where the same amount of variation was represented by rigid and non-rigid models. Eye tracking was used to record how the subjects performed the assessment. The result shows that there is a significant difference in how simulation results are interpreted using rigid versus non-rigid simulation.

perceived quality

non-rigid variation simulation

tolerance modelling

eye tracking

non-nominal visualisation

virtual assessment

Author

Casper Wickman

Chalmers, Product and Production Development, Product Development

Ola S Wagersten

Chalmers, Product and Production Development, Product Development

Karin Nordvall

Chalmers, Product and Production Development, Product Development

Rikard Söderberg

Chalmers, Product and Production Development, Product Development

Journal of Engineering Design

0954-4828 (ISSN) 1466-1837 (eISSN)

Vol. 25 1-3 1-24

Subject Categories

Mechanical Engineering

Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Areas of Advance

Production

DOI

10.1080/09544828.2013.875522

More information

Created

10/8/2017