Control of the resistive wall mode with internal coils in the DIII-D tokamak
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2005

Internal coils, 'I-Coils', were installed inside the vacuum vessel of the DIII-D device to generate non-axisymmetric magnetic fields to act directly on the plasma. These fields are predicted to stabilize the resistive wall mode (RWM) branch of the long-wavelength external kink mode with plasma beta close to the ideal wall limit. Feedback using these I-Coils was found to be more effective as compared to using external coils located outside the vacuum vessel. Locating the coils inside the vessel allows for a faster response and the coil geometry also allows for better coupling to the helical mode structure. Initial results were reported previously (Strait E.J. et al 2004 Phys. Plasmas 11 2505). This paper reports on results from extended feedback stabilization operations, achieving plasma parameters up to the regime of Cβ ≈ 1.0 and open loop growth rates of γopenτw ≳ 25 where the RWM was predicted to be unstable with only the 'rotational viscous stabilization mechanism'. Here Cβ ≈ (β - βno-wall.limit)/(βideal.wall.limit - βno-wall.limit) is a measure of the beta relative to the stability limits without a wall and with a perfectly conducting wall, and τw is the resistive flux penetration time of the wall. These feedback experimental results clarified the processes of dynamic error field correction and direct RWM stabilization, both of which took place simultaneously during RWM feedback stabilization operation. MARS-F modelling provides a critical rotation velocity in reasonable agreement with the experiment and predicts that the growth rate increases rapidly as rotation decreases below the critical. The MARS-F code also predicted that for successful RWM magnetic feedback, the characteristic time of the power supply should be limited to a fraction of the growth time of the targeted RWM. The possibility of further improvements in the presently achievable range of operation of feedback gain values is also discussed.

Författare

M. Okabayashi

General Atomics

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

J. Bialek

Columbia University in the City of New York

Anders Bondeson

Chalmers, Tillämpad mekanik

M. S. Chance

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

M. S. Chu

General Atomics

A. M. Garofalo

Columbia University in the City of New York

R. Hatcher

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Y. In

FAR-TECH, Inc.

G. L. Jackson

General Atomics

R. J. Jayakumar

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

T. H. Jensen

General Atomics

O. Katsuro-Hopkins

Columbia University in the City of New York

R. J. La Haye

General Atomics

Yueqiang Liu

Chalmers University of Technology

G. A. Navratil

Columbia University in the City of New York

H. Reimerdes

Columbia University in the City of New York

J. T. Scoville

General Atomics

E. J. Strait

General Atomics

M. Takechi

Japan Atomic Energy Agency

A. D. Turnbull

General Atomics

P. Gohil

General Atomics

J. S. Kim

Japan Atomic Energy Agency

M. A. Makowski

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

J. Manickam

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

J. Menard

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory

Nuclear Fusion

0029-5515 (ISSN)

Vol. 45 1715-1731

Ämneskategorier

Maskinteknik

DOI

10.1088/0029-5515/45/12/028