When Driving Automation Fails. Drivers' Experiences and Interactions
Doktorsavhandling, 2014

Drivers’ interactions with automation based on experiences from real driving, and results from driving simulators were under investigation in this thesis. The thesis had a mixed methods research approach and was exploratory. Special attention has been given to driver behavior on exposure to unexpected automation failures. Questions posed were: 1) How are end-users’ of ADAS experiencing automated driving? (Paper I, II, and III) 2) What is the influence of automation failure on driving performance? (Paper IV, V, and VI) 3) How does the extent of automation failure concerning deceleration effect driving performance? (Paper IV, V, and VI) 4) In what way does the level of automation influence driving performance in safety critical events due to automation failures? (Paper VI) The results are based on six papers, adopting an approach with a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. In Paper I and II focus group interviews were conducted to address end-users’ experiences of vehicle automation, mainly ACC but additional systems were included as well. Paper III was a survey questionnaire addressing the same experiences as did Paper I and II, though with the addition of evaluation of usability and acceptance of ACC. In Paper IV and V a driving simulator experiment was conducted to address automated driving in situations with automation failures. Paper VI was also a driving simulator study with a focus on automated driving in safety critical events due to automation failures. Although Paper VI included an additional level of automation and focused on deceleration failures in which the automated system to some extent failed to brake sufficiently, while Paper IV and V had a broader failure focus including acceleration and speeding failures. The findings include notions on behavioral adaptations and monitoring inefficiencies for drivers facing failures. Implications for design, failure detection, and traffic safety are discussed. With regard to human-automation-interaction it is concluded that automation has effects on driver’s behavior, and that measures towards failure containment and driver control should be taken. Experience, mental models, and situation awareness are used to explain changes and differences in drivers’ behavior.


simulator studies

driver behavior

Automated driving

automation failures

VF, V-huset, Chalmers, Sven Hultins gata 6, Göteborg
Opponent: Dick de Waard


Niklas Strand

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Design and Human Factors

SAFER, Fordons- och trafiksäkerhetscentrum

Exploring end-user experiences: Self-perceived notions on use of adaptive cruise control systems

Conference Proceedings of the European Conference on Human Centred Design for Intelligent Transport System,; (2010)p. 487-496

Paper i proceeding

Exploring end-user experiences: self-perceived notions on use of adaptive cruise control systems

IET Intelligent Transport Systems,; Vol. 5(2011)p. 134-140

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Driver performance in the presence of adaptive cruise control related failures: Implications for safety analysis and fault tolerance

2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W),; (2013)p. 1-10

Paper i proceeding

Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour,; Vol. 27(2014)p. 218-228

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Interaction with and use of driver assistance systems: A study of end-user experiences

Proceedings of the 18th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Orlando, FL, October 16-20, 2011,; (2011)

Paper i proceeding


Hållbar utveckling




Tillämpad psykologi

Robotteknik och automation



Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola. Ny serie

VF, V-huset, Chalmers, Sven Hultins gata 6, Göteborg

Opponent: Dick de Waard

Mer information