Estonian energy supply strategy assessment for 2035 and its vulnerability to climate driven shocks
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2016

Estonia is a relatively small country with a limited supply of indigenous energy resources mainly consisting of oil shale, wood, and peat. Estonia is also the only country in Europe with a dominant electricity production by burning oil shale. Around 90% of the overall electric energy production in Estonia comes from the Narva Power Plants. This presents great challenges and problems due to massive emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere as well as radiological impact on the environment. Therefore, the current energy supply strategy can be considered hazardous and an unpopular choice for future energy system planning. In this article, we analyze the current energy policy as well as inclusion of new strategies to produce electricity for Estonia for a target year of 2035. We use a computer model Model for Supply Strategy Alternatives and their General Environmental Impacts (MESSAGE) to provide optimization and aim in helping the policymakers in the Estonian decision making process. We also add a specific case in the MESSAGE model to examine the ability of the current electricity supply strategy to handle climate related shocks with a special focus on cold weather in two plausible cases; single cold winter and prolonged cold winter. Results indicate that unexpected demand shocks may cause serious losses in gross domestic product (GDP). Therefore, the authors come to the conclusion that extra capacity is highly recommendable for a number of reasons. We also find that nuclear power becomes economically preferable to oil shale with a CO2 tax of Euro20/t. Yet moving toward nuclear or other low CO2 alternatives presents certain challenges. (c) 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 35: 469-478, 2016

performance

nuclear

optimization model

natural radionuclides

fired power-plants

demand shock

cost

model for supply strategy alternatives

energy system planning

enrichment

Författare

[Person f605214b-c29a-446b-8f5d-098a328eb0c4 not found]

Chalmers, Energi och miljö, Fysisk resursteori

[Person 607e3706-ff52-412e-9046-63cfb81c680a not found]

Tartu Ülikool

[Person 95b7df02-d274-453e-bf61-400b6b726bf6 not found]

Tartu Ülikool

[Person 82185700-f843-4a05-a92b-f556d6dd2612 not found]

Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (KTH)

[Person cd6131b3-62f2-450c-8205-68de8fc40700 not found]

Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (KTH)

Internationales Institut fuer Angewandte Systemanalyse

[Person bb94c4cb-e3fc-487a-b86a-723bc767729f not found]

Consultant

[Person 2fdb7f16-94dc-48c8-9182-5228713e28c9 not found]

Tartu Ülikool

[Person a08ef9fb-c09f-42b7-8a08-5112d543cfc2 not found]

Tartu Ülikool

Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy

1944-7442 (ISSN)

Vol. 35 2 469-478

Ämneskategorier

Energiteknik

Energisystem

DOI

10.1002/ep.12240

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2018-05-17