A comparison of two frameworks for kinematic hardening in hyperelasto-plasticity
Paper i proceeding, 2017

In this work we compare two frameworks for thermodynamically consistent hyperelasto-plasticity with kinematic hardening. The first was formulated by Dettmer and Reese (2004), inspired by Lion (2000), and has been used to model sheet metal forming. The second, formulated by Wallin et al. (2003), has been used to model large shear strains and cyclic ratcheting behavior of pearlitic steel (Johansson et al. 2006). In this paper we show that these frameworks can result in equivalent models for certain choices of free energies. Furthermore, it is shown that the choices of free energy found in the literature only result in minor differences. These differences are discussed theoretically and investigated numerically.

Kinematic hardening

Hyperelasto-plasticity

Finite strains

Författare

Knut Andreas Meyer

Chalmers, Tillämpad mekanik, Material- och beräkningsmekanik

Magnus Ekh

Chalmers, Tillämpad mekanik, Material- och beräkningsmekanik

Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Plasticity - Fundamentals and Applications, COMPLAS 2017

Vol. 2017-January 342-350
978-849469096-9 (ISBN)

14th International Conference on Computational Plasticity - Fundamentals and Applications, COMPLAS 2017
Barcelona, Spain,

Inverkan av anisotropi på utmattningsprickor under rullkontakt (CHARMEC MU34)

Chalmers järnvägsmekanik (CHARMEC), 2015-05-18 -- 2020-05-15.

Europeiska kommissionen (EU), 2015-05-18 -- 2020-05-15.

Ämneskategorier

Teknisk mekanik

Infrastruktur

C3SE (Chalmers Centre for Computational Science and Engineering)

Styrkeområden

Materialvetenskap

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2024-07-17