Social Means Do Not Justify Corruptible Ends: A Realist Perspective of Social Innovation and Design
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2017

This article introduces designers to the dilemma that arises when twin aspects of social innovation—social means and social ends—do not align. Some academics have noted the anti-social, anti-political, and anti-inventive effects emerging from the spread of microfinance practices. We discuss the tendency for social design and innovation literature to focus on design processes rather than outcomes, and introduce ideas from realist political theory to account for the corruptibility of social innovations. We suggest that designers can prevent the corruption of social outcomes by shifting from idealist “what if” scenarios to realist “who whom?” questions instead.

User participation

Design rationale

Social design

Evaluation

Författare

Otto Von Busch

Karl Palmås

Chalmers, Teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Science, Technology and Society

She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation

2405-8726 (ISSN)

Vol. 2 4 275-287

Ämneskategorier

Design

Samhällsbyggnadsteknik

Statsvetenskap

Styrkeområden

Building Futures

Drivkrafter

Innovation och entreprenörskap