Biomass production in plantations: Land constraints increase dependency on irrigation water
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2018

Integrated assessment model scenarios project rising deployment of biomass‐using energy systems in climate change mitigation scenarios. But there is concern that bioenergy deployment will increase competition for land and water resources and obstruct objectives such as nature protection, the preservation of carbon‐rich ecosystems, and food security. To study the relative importance of water and land availability as biophysical constraints to bioenergy deployment at a global scale, we use a process‐detailed, spatially explicit biosphere model to simulate rain‐fed and irrigated biomass plantation supply along with the corresponding water consumption for different scenarios concerning availability of land and water resources. We find that global plantation supplies are mainly limited by land availability and only secondarily by freshwater availability. As a theoretical upper limit, if all suitable lands on Earth, besides land currently used in agriculture, were available for bioenergy plantations (“Food first” scenario), total plantation supply would be in the range 2,010–2,300 EJ/year depending on water availability and use. Excluding all currently protected areas reduces the supply by 60%. Excluding also areas where conversion to biomass plantations causes carbon emis- sions that might be considered unacceptably high will reduce the total plantation supply further. For example, excluding all areas where soil and vegetation carbon stocks exceed 150 tC/ha (“Carbon threshold savanna” scenario) reduces the supply to 170–290 EJ/year. With decreasing land availability, the amount of water available for irrigation becomes vitally important. In the least restrictive land availability scenario (“Food first”), up to 77% of global plantation biomass supply is obtained without additional irrigation. This share is reduced to 31% for the most restrictive “Carbon threshold savanna” scenario. The results highlight the critical —and geographically varying—importance of co‐managing land and water resources if substantial contributions of bioenergy are to be reached in mitigation portfolios.

global biosphere model

climate change





Göran Berndes

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Yvonne Jans

Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK)

Wolfgang Lucht

Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK)

Jens Heinke

Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK)

Dieter Gerten

Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK)

GCB Bioenergy

1757-1693 (ISSN) 1757-1707 (eISSN)

Vol. 00 1-17


Hållbar utveckling