Rural/urban: Laying bare the controversy
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2018

Concepts are the basic building blocks of all knowledge, while the strength of any societal project is dependent on the quality of those concepts. As two of the oldest geographical concepts still in widespread use, 'rural/urban' stand in stark contrast to the immense changes encountered by the society over the last century, let alone decades. To better understand this controversy, this paper moves away from conventional rural and urban theory, and instead focuses on the philosophical constitution of this conceptual pair. By critically evaluating six of the most common conceptions of 'rural/urban', including their pros and cons, this paper makes a case for reconfiguring our relationship with familiar understandings of societal organization. The paper concludes that by paying greater attention to how concepts operate at a cognitive level, how they are construed and collectively maintained, can help facilitate decisions whether 'rurallurban' are truly analytically contributory to a specific line of thought or action, or whether they merely linger as a cultural ostinato that is too elusive to be conquered or held.

knowledge production


critical analysis


conceptions of space


Mirek Dymitrow

Göteborgs universitet

Mistra Urban Futures

Geographia Polonica

0016-7282 (ISSN)

Vol. 91 4 375-397


Idé- och lärdomshistoria





Mer information

Senast uppdaterat