CO2 transportation infrastructure and biomass supply systems for carbon capture and storage - A modeling study of Swedish industry
Licentiatavhandling, 2022
To evaluate the potential for logging residues to supply heat for the capture process, heat balance calculations on the site level were combined with an assessment of regional availability and existing use of logging residues. This work shows that the potential for regional logging residues to act as an enabler of BECCS is dependent upon regional conditions, primarily the existing biomass use in the district heating sector. The cost of transporting logging residues is highly distance-dependent, therefore, the ability to mobilize large volumes of these residues as close as possible to the plant applying capture is important. The costs for supplying logging residues to the plants investigated are in the range of 21–28 €/tCO2 captured. These costs increase rapidly per tCO2 captured and end up with higher costs in southern Sweden than in the north of the country.
The development of a large-scale CCS system that includes the capture, liquefaction, truck transport on-shore and ship transport off-shore was investigated by developing and using a cost-minimizing optimization model. To incentivize capture, CO2 pricing, emission budgets and targets for capture were implemented. The use of an integrated CO2 transportation infrastructure that connects several CCS plants with a CO2 storage site is shown to be cost-efficient at emissions price levels of around 80 €/tCO2 (excluding the cost for final storage). As the cost structure of CCS systems, including the capture, liquefaction, and transportation infrastructure, is primarily composed of the cost for capture and liquefaction, the system build-up over time and the total cost are most sensitive to cost uncertainties in relation to the on-site installations. Ships for offshore transportation also make up a significant part of the cost, so smaller sites located close to the final storage location can be favored over larger sites, despite having a higher cost for capture. The incentive structures chosen for motivating capture influence which sites are economically optimal to implement CO2 capture at, and at which point in time. Waste-fired heat and power plants are economically feasible when capture targets are set for biogenic CO2 in combination with a cost for fossil CO2 emissions. Including BECCS in emission budgets reduces the system cost but tends to delay investments in mitigation and compensate at a later stage with BECCS. To facilitate technology development and near-term implementation of CCS and BECCS, it is important to consider that including carbon dioxide removal into the same policy regime that controls fossil CO2 emissions, may result in the cost optimal strategy entailing a delay in fossil fuel mitigation.
BECCS
cost optimization
infrastructure
incentives
CCS
biomass supply
industry
CO2 transportation
Författare
Sebastian Karlsson
Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Energiteknik
Large-Scale Implementation of Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage in the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry Involving Biomass Supply at the Regional Level
Frontiers in Energy Research,;Vol. 9(2021)
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift
Karlsson, S. Normann, F. Odenberger, M. Johnsson, F. Modeling the development of a carbon capture and transportation infrastructure for Swedish industry
Karlsson, S. Normann, F. Johnsson, F. Cost-optimal CO2 capture and transport infrastructure – A case study of Sweden
Koldioxifri skandinavisk industri
Västra Götalandsregionen (MN2018-00139), 2019-09-01 -- 2023-08-31.
Ämneskategorier
Energiteknik
Annan naturresursteknik
Bioenergi
Energisystem
Styrkeområden
Energi
Utgivare
Chalmers
EF, EDIT-huset, Elektrogården 1, 412 58 Göteborg, Zoom Password: CCS
Opponent: Kenneth Möllersten, IVL - Swedish Environmental Research Institute