Engineering Judgment and Education: An Arendtian Account
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2024

This article discusses the meaning of judgment in engineering and engineering education, and it does so by introducing the work of political thinker Hannah Arendt. The argument presents Arendt’s non-cognitivist account of judgment as a counterpoint to prevailing conceptions of engineering judgment. Moreover, it suggests that Arendt’s unique perspective on what it means to be human in the context of modern technoscience is relevant to the discussion on the place of the humanities and liberal arts in engineering education.

critical thinking

humanities

Hannah Arendt

engineering education

liberal arts

cognitivism

engineering judgment

Författare

Karl Palmås

Chalmers, Teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Science, Technology and Society

Engineering Studies

1937-8629 (ISSN) 19408374 (eISSN)

Vol. 16 3 184-205

Ämneskategorier

Utbildningsvetenskap

Idé- och lärdomshistoria

Sociologi

Lärande och undervisning

Pedagogiskt arbete

DOI

10.1080/19378629.2024.2333239

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2024-12-02