Benchmarking Relevance for Hospital Design and Planning: An International Web-Based Survey
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2024

Objective: The study aims to investigate what design practitioners and healthcare facility managers deem as important benchmarking metrics worldwide, investigating country differences in benchmarking usage and which metrics are prioritized.Background: Benchmarking is a regular practice in the healthcare sector, both for clinical and managerial aspects to compare, measure, and improve standardized processes. However, limited knowledge is available about benchmarking procedures in hospital planning, design, and construction.Methods: A web-based survey was designed, revised, and pilot-tested in five countries; it was adjusted according to local experts' suggestions and submitted globally via SoSci multilingual platform to persons involved in hospital design, research, construction, and facility management. It was composed of closed questions on 5-point Likert-type scale ranking frequency or importance and open-ended questions divided into six sections. Two hundred and eighty full responses have been collected. Statistical analysis was performed via PowerBI and R-Studio, while qualitative analysis was performed via MAXQDA.Results: The findings reported allow for both specific insights per each country or category as well as enabling general considerations of a practice that is becoming always more international with 30%-50% of respondents working in the international context. The evaluation of the survey highlights the most important benchmarks, among others. For example, for respondents from the top five countries (Sweden, Spain, Germany, Italy, and the United States), the most important metric for benchmark comparability is whether the project was new construction, new construction attached to an existing hospital, or interior renovation. Construction date, client type (public vs. private), and country of location were also generally rated as the most important metrics by respondents. Other metrics that were consistently rated as important globally included inpatient unit layout, walking distances, number of floors, and whether all patient rooms are private. Space-related metrics are considered very important elements in the design and planning of healthcare facilities worldwide. Regarding cost-related metrics, all countries consider the ratio construction cost per building gross area as the most important.Conclusions: Benchmarking emerges as a relevant tool for hospital design and planning as it can support efficiency, standardization, and confidence; currently, benchmarking is still underutilized due to the challenge of international comparison, access to data outside each specific company, and variation design metrics nationally. Benchmarking strategies should be further investigated to support knowledge exchange and to ensure reliable and comparable information globally.

questionnaire/survey

international design

architect

healthcare designer

academic research

hospital

design regulations

research informed design

design guidelines

benchmarking

practice research

Författare

Hannah-Kathrin Silja Viergutz

Universität Wien

Laura Cambra-Rufino

Universidad Politecnica de Madrid

Michael Apple

HDR Inc.

Abigail Heithoff

HDR Inc.

Göran Lindahl

Chalmers, Arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik, Construction Management

Stefano Capolongo

Dept Architecture

Andrea Brambilla

Politecnico di Milano

Dept Architecture

HERD

1937-5867 (ISSN) 21675112 (eISSN)

Vol. 17 3 189-208

Ämneskategorier

Samhällsbyggnadsteknik

DOI

10.1177/19375867241239324

PubMed

38591575

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2024-10-12