Inside the Jury Room: A Report on the Theory and Practice of Selecting a Winning Design
Report, 2024
The aim is of this is to critically reflect and theorize about how qualified jurors have succeeded in identifying the best design solutions in the two Norrköping competitions. Through a close reading of transcribed field notes from meetings inside the jury room, the authors propose a judging theory that shows how professional jurors choose winning designs. Some of the fundamental dilemmas that confront jurors are highlighted. The idea behind this theorizing is that professionals making qualified assessments must go through certain critical steps for ethical reasons. In this model, finding the best solution is influenced by four factors: (a) context and policy, (b) design proposals and competition site, (c) judging process and competition program, and (d) selection of the winner in the jury report. The theorizing describes and explains how professionals act in fulfilling their assignment of identifying a winner. The theory represents a model of general interest for jury work in architecture and urban design competitions.
Design developer competition
winning design
judging proposals
finding the best solution
Author
Magnus Rönn
Chalmers, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Design
Anna Braide
Chalmers, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Building Design
Christian Koch
Halmstad University
Design developer competition as tool for climate adaptation in building -innovative solutions for dwellings
VINNOVA (2021-02466), 2021-11-01 -- 2023-10-31.
Driving Forces
Sustainable development
Innovation and entrepreneurship
Areas of Advance
Building Futures (2010-2018)
Subject Categories
Architecture
Rapport ACE / Institutionen för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik, Chalmers tekniska högskola: 2024:1
Publisher
Chalmers