Inside the Jury Room: A Report on the Theory and Practice of Selecting a Winning Design
Rapport, 2024
The aim is of this is to critically reflect and theorize about how qualified jurors have succeeded in identifying the best design solutions in the two Norrköping competitions. Through a close reading of transcribed field notes from meetings inside the jury room, the authors propose a judging theory that shows how professional jurors choose winning designs. Some of the fundamental dilemmas that confront jurors are highlighted. The idea behind this theorizing is that professionals making qualified assessments must go through certain critical steps for ethical reasons. In this model, finding the best solution is influenced by four factors: (a) context and policy, (b) design proposals and competition site, (c) judging process and competition program, and (d) selection of the winner in the jury report. The theorizing describes and explains how professionals act in fulfilling their assignment of identifying a winner. The theory represents a model of general interest for jury work in architecture and urban design competitions.
Design developer competition
winning design
judging proposals
finding the best solution
Författare
Magnus Rönn
Chalmers, Arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik, Byggnadsdesign
Anna Braide
Chalmers, Arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik, Byggnadsdesign
Christian Koch
Högskolan i Halmstad
Markanvisningstävlingen som verktyg för klimatanpassning av byggd miljö - innovativa lösningar för bostäder
VINNOVA (2021-02466), 2021-11-01 -- 2023-10-31.
Drivkrafter
Hållbar utveckling
Innovation och entreprenörskap
Styrkeområden
Building Futures (2010-2018)
Ämneskategorier
Arkitektur
Rapport ACE / Institutionen för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnadsteknik, Chalmers tekniska högskola: 2024:1
Utgivare
Chalmers