Tacit Knowledge: Nature and Transfer in Safety-Critical Systems, Application on Maritime Pilot Training
Licentiate thesis, 2024
knowledge within such training environments. Moreover, the licentiate thesis explored the nature of tacit knowledge, developed a taxonomy related to associated concepts, defined tacit knowledge as a framework and compared it to maritime pilot training, and proposed guidelines to enhance its transfer
in such training settings. An exploratory mixed-methods design was employed, incorporating a systematic literature review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, evaluating 22 studies on tacit knowledge transfer in safety-critical systems. In addition, a study grounded in activity theory investigated tacit knowledge transfer in maritime pilot training, involving 21 participants. A usability study further examined the application of eye-tracking as a didactic tool in simulator-based maritime pilot training, with tacit knowledge evaluations conducted on 57 participants. Data were collected through interviews, observations, questionnaires, document analysis, eye-tracking, and comparative explanatory compilations. The data analysis utilized descriptive statistical methods, inductive thematic analysis, activity theory, the SECI model, and contextual frameworks. The findings revealed that tacit knowledge resided in various domains and faculties, making it difficult to define and operationalize. Tacit knowledge was therefore reconceptualized as a framework encompassing several interrelated components. When this framework was applied to maritime pilot training, tacit knowledge transfer was observed only partially, in social learning environments such as apprenticeships during actual pilotage, but was less evident in other areas of training, particularly in simulator sessions. In these contexts, concepts such as intuition, procedural knowledge, pattern recognition, and muscle memory were often used interchangeably but were later identified as related yet distinct. Guidelines for more effective tacit knowledge transfer included alumni functions, job rotation, mentorship programs, staff rotation, and the development of repositories to capture best practices and operational experiences. Furthermore, guidelines for conducting efficient research into tacit knowledge transfer could serve as a foundation for enhancing the training syllabus.
In conclusion, this licentiate thesis presents a comprehensive and systematic mapping and deconstruction of tacit knowledge, along with a taxonomy on the subject. This work culminates in the development of a framework to conceptualize and define tacit knowledge applicable to research on organizational learning, particularly in maritime pilot training. Furthermore, this licentiate thesis offers guidelines aimed at enhancing maritime pilot training in both organizational and research contexts.
maritime pilot training
SECI model
systematic literature review
simulators
activity theory
eye-tracking
Tacit knowledge
safety-critical systems
mixed-methods
socio-technical systems
Author
Rikard Eklund
Chalmers, Industrial and Materials Science, Design & Human Factors
To sea, or not to sea, that is the question: Evaluating eye-tracking as didactical support and facilitator of tacit knowledge transfer in simulator-based maritime pilot training
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,;(2024)p. 29-48
Paper in proceeding
Transferring Tacit Knowledge During Maritime Pilot Training: Assessment of Methods in Use
Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics International,;Vol. 60(2022)p. 665-674
Paper in proceeding
Eklund, R., Osvalder A.-L. (2024). Transferring tacit knowledge in safety-critical systems—a systematic literature review
Subject Categories
Didactics
Educational Sciences
Learning
Psychology
Pedagogical Work
Pedagogy
Areas of Advance
Information and Communication Technology
Transport
Learning and teaching
Pedagogical work
Publisher
Chalmers
The Licentiate Seminar will be held in the Virtual Development Laboratory (VDL), Chalmers Tvärgata 4, Chalmers University of Technology
Opponent: Jonas Borell, psychologist and Human-factors specialist, Department of Ergonomics and Aerosol Technology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden