Decision support for sustainable groundwater management in underground construction
Doctoral thesis, 2026

Groundwater systems support vital services and benefits to human well-being, but underground construction and the associated leakage of groundwater may impair the capacity of these systems to perform their essential functions and provide vital services. Leakage of groundwater into underground constructions must therefore be managed to reduce the risk of negative impact due to lowering groundwater levels in the surrounding hydrogeological environments. The overall aim of this thesis is to develop methods and present examples of how the well-established risk management process according to the International Organization för Standardization (ISO) can be applied to manage hydrogeological risks in a sustainable and transparent manner. Four studies were carried out and specific contributions from the studies include: a risk-management framework for developing decision support for leakage management (Paper I); a method and example for identification of leakage induced risks (Paper III); a method for translating risks and risk-mitigation measures into relevant cost and benefit items to be valued in a risk-based decision analysis (Paper II and III); model chains for risk analysis and risk evaluation using CBA and CEA that allow for updating when new information is available (Paper II and IV); and methods for monetization of costs and benefits (Paper II and IV). Results from the studies in this PhD thesis all constitute key aspects of a successful and transparent risk management process and thus decisions on implementation of risk-mitigation measures. The thesis also provides a discussion on the importance of probabilistic modelling and transparency when developing models, the need to consider relevant boundary conditions that result in limitations regarding possible decisions, the limitations of using CBA or CEA for risk evaluation, as well as the task of taking a decision based on the decision support provided by the framework and methods presented in this thesis. Recommendation on how to apply the framework and the methods is also presented. As a final part of the thesis, the main conclusions from the thesis are presented and the need for further studies and developments of methods are discussed.

Underground construction

Decision support

Hydrogeological risks

Risk-mitigation

Risk management

SB2-H3
Opponent: Wout Broere, Delft University of Technology

Author

Johanna Merisalu

Chalmers, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Geology and Geotechnics

Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis for mitigating hydrogeological risks in underground construction

Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology,;Vol. 131(2023)

Journal article

Merisalu, J., Söderqvist, T., & Rosén, L. Cost-effectiveness analysis as decision support for groundwater leakage management in tunnels.

Beneath our feet lies a complex hydrogeological world. Groundwater supports everything from ground stability and ecosystems to drinking water supplies and cultural heritage. When a tunnel or underground facility dewater aquifers and lowers groundwater levels, risks may be triggered. At the same time, decisions about how to prevent or reduce risks must be made under considerable uncertainty. Conditions in the subsurface are never fully known, and new information is revealed gradually as construction progresses. Mitigation measures can be costly, and the consequences of choosing too much or too little protection can be large. This results in a need for structured and transparent decision‑support tools that account for both hydrogeological processes and societal impacts. This dissertation develops such tools. Building on the international ISO 31000 risk‑management framework, it presents methods for identifying, quantifying, and evaluating hydrogeological risks in underground construction from a societal and economic perspective. Central to the work is the integration of the hydrogeological conditions at a site with decision analysis tools such as cost–benefit analysis (CBA) and cost‑effectiveness analysis (CEA) which enables a comparison of alternative mitigation strategies in terms of societal value. A key component of the thesis is an adapted cascade model that links physical changes in groundwater, such as lowered pressure head or reduced saturated thickness, to economic consequences. Case studies from three Swedish tunnel projects illustrate how the framework can be applied in practice. These examples show that while hydrogeological risks can be substantial, some legally required mitigation measures may be disproportionately costly relative to the risks they address. At the same time, the analyses highlight situations where insufficient mitigation could result in extensive societal damage.

Villkorsutformning för grundvattenpåverkan vid utförande av undermarksanläggningar

Swedish Transport Administration (TRV2019/116145), 2019-01-01 -- 2019-12-31.

Cost-benefit analysis of hydrogeologic disturbances in underground projects

Formas (2022-01074), 2023-01-01 -- 2025-12-31.

Riskanalys av hydrogeologiska störningar i undermarksprojekt

Swedish Transport Administration, 2020-02-01 -- 2022-03-31.

BeFo - Rock engineering research foundation (BeFo414), 2020-02-01 -- 2022-03-31.

Driving Forces

Sustainable development

Subject Categories (SSIF 2025)

Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

DOI

10.63959/chalmers.dt/5815

ISBN

978-91-8103-358-8

Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola. Ny serie: 5815

Publisher

Chalmers

SB2-H3

Opponent: Wout Broere, Delft University of Technology

More information

Latest update

2/16/2026