Influence of rigid and non-rigid variation simulations when assessing perceived quality of split-lines
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2014

Non-nominal visualisation is used to evaluate how geometrical variation influences the appearance of split-lines between components on a car body. Depending on the simulation method, visualised variation can be represented in an unrealistic manner, which can affect the perception of the result. This paper presents a comparative study in which eye-tracking equipment has been used in order to explore whether the interpretation of variation differs between rigid- and non-rigid-based variation simulations during the evaluation of visualised models. Subjects from the automotive industry were asked to evaluate two virtual models where the same amount of variation was represented by rigid and non-rigid models. Eye tracking was used to record how the subjects performed the assessment. The result shows that there is a significant difference in how simulation results are interpreted using rigid versus non-rigid simulation.

perceived quality

non-rigid variation simulation

tolerance modelling

eye tracking

non-nominal visualisation

virtual assessment

Författare

[Person dd7021c0-a5dc-4c37-94ba-a9bfb9b78d48 not found]

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktutveckling

[Person 5dc387c2-5bf2-4c26-885a-01f7192fe173 not found]

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktutveckling

[Person a1108c9b-362d-49b6-9e98-2ce75043f712 not found]

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktutveckling

[Person 86c9a99e-f3ac-438a-8588-2f9c9ca6d910 not found]

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktutveckling

Journal of Engineering Design

0954-4828 (ISSN) 1466-1837 (eISSN)

Vol. 25 1-3 1-24

Ämneskategorier

Maskinteknik

Produktionsteknik, arbetsvetenskap och ergonomi

Styrkeområden

Produktion

DOI

10.1080/09544828.2013.875522

Mer information

Skapat

2017-10-08