How MAD are we? Empirical Evidence for Model-driven Agile Development.
Paper i proceeding, 2014

Since the launch of the Agile Manifesto there has been numerous propositions in how to combine agile practices with Model-driven Development. Ideally the combination would give the benefits of agile (e.g. rapid response to changes and shorter lead times) with the promises of Model-driven development (such as high-level designs and automation). A commonality among the proposals is that they lack in empirical evaluation. Our contribution is a systematic literature review to find out to what experiences there are of Model-driven Agile Development, MAD, from an empirical context. Among our conslusions is that MAD is sitll an immature research area and that more experience reports from industry are needed before we can claim to have understood the possibilities and drawbacks of MAD.

Empirical Software Engineering


Systematic Literature Review

Model-Driven Engineering


Håkan Burden

Göteborgs universitet

Sebastian Hansson

Yu Zhao

Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Extreme Modeling co-located with ACM/IEEE 17th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages & Systems (MoDELS 2014)

1613-0073 (ISSN)

Vol. 1239 2-11


Datavetenskap (datalogi)

Mer information