A review of low carbon fuel policies: Principles, program status and future directions
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2016

A low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) is a market-based policy that specifies declining standards for the average lifecycle fuel carbon intensity (AFCI) of transportation fuels sold in a region. This paper: (i) compares transportation fuel carbon policies in terms of their economic efficiency, fuel price impacts, greenhouse gas emission reductions, and incentives for innovation; (ii) discusses key regulatory design features of LCFS policies; and (iii) provides an update on the implementation status of LCFS policies in California, the European Union, British Columbia, and Oregon. The economics literature finds that an intensity standard implicitly taxes emissions and subsidizes output. The output subsidy results in an intensity standard being inferior to a carbon tax in a first-best world, although the inefficiency can be corrected with a properly designed consumption tax (or mitigated by a properly designed carbon tax or cap-and-trade program). In California, from 2011 to 2015 the share of alternative fuels in the regulated transportation fuels pool increased by 30%, and the reported AFCI of all alternative fuels declined 21%. LCFS credit prices have varied considerably, rising to above $100/credit in the first half of 2016. LCFS programs in other jurisdictions share many features with California's, but have distinct provisions as well. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Lifecycle emissions

impacts

climate-change mitigation

Carbon policy

Fuel policy

uncertainty

land-use change

biofuel policies

market-mediated emissions

life-cycle assessment

Alternative fuels

greenhouse-gas emissions

standard

Performance standard

Biofuels

technology

Författare

Sonia Yeh

Chalmers, Energi och miljö, Fysisk resursteori

J. Witcover

UC Davis

G. E. Lade

Iowa State University

D. Sperling

UC Davis

Energy Policy

0301-4215 (ISSN)

Vol. 97 220-234

Drivkrafter

Hållbar utveckling

Styrkeområden

Energi

Ämneskategorier

Miljövetenskap

DOI

10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.029