Land use options for staying within the Planetary Boundaries – Synergies and trade-offs between global and local sustainability goals
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2018

In this paper we develop and assess alternative global land use patterns, guided by the Planetary Boundaries framework, to quantify land use opportunities for staying within the safe environmental operating space. Through a simulation based multi-criteria land use optimisation procedure, we determine the potential upper bounds of improved terrestrial carbon storage and of biodiversity conservation, while also meeting the Planetary Boundaries of land and water use and ensuring improved food supply for a population of 9 billion people. We present alternative global land use scenarios that could simultaneously yield better outcomes on all of these goals, in particular if substantial increases in agricultural productivity are realised. Terrestrial carbon sequestration potentials reach 98 GtC, whereas the potential reduction of the risk to biodiversity is 53%. Furthermore, we analyse the potential synergies and trade-offs of these global land use scenarios with national- and local-level environmental and developmental goals such as those specified in the SDGs, e.g. related to nature conservation, afforestation, bioenergy, employment and equity. This model-based information on synergies and trade-offs between different sustainability goals at different scales can be used in scientific assessments of transformation pathways, in policy making, in support of improved horizontal and vertical policy coherence and multi-level institutional solutions, as well as in SDG implementation, sustainable production and consumption (SDG 12) and global partnership mechanisms (SDG 17).

Carbon sequestration

Planetary Boundaries

Land use

Sustainable Development Goals

Biodiversity

Optimisation

Författare

Vera Heck

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK)

Aalto-Yliopisto

Holger Hoff

Stockholm Environment Institute

Potsdam-Institut für Klimafolgenforschung (PIK)

Stefan Wirsenius

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Carsten Meyer

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv)

Universität Leipzig

Holger Kreft

Georg-August-Universität Göttingen

Global Environmental Change

0959-3780 (ISSN)

Vol. 49 73-84

Ämneskategorier

Tvärvetenskapliga studier

Miljö- och naturvårdsvetenskap

Miljöledning

DOI

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.004