Comparing sustainability transition labs across process, effects and impacts: Insights from Canada and Sweden
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2022

Purposeful transformative change on a level of societal systems, structures and practices is called for in response to contemporary sustainability challenges. Sustainability transition labs and arenas represent a particular set of governance innovations seeking to foster systemic change based on deliberate engagement of multiple actors around complex issues of concern. Most labs aim for long-term contributions in addressing persistent societal challenges and transitioning into sustainability, yet are seldomly evaluated on whether, how and to what extents such contributions become realised in practice. In this paper, we further an analytical framework for comparatively analysing sustainability transition labs and arenas with emphasis on their processes, effects and impacts. The framework is applied on two cases: Energy Futures Lab initiated in Alberta, Canada and the arenas for a Fossil Independent West Sweden - Climate 2030. In particular, the comparison showcases how contextual difference in terms of urgency and turbulence may influence lab activities and how ownership and governance conditions may influence the various directions outputs, effects and wider impacts took. The comparison further illuminates how backcasting and the multi-level perspective may serve as complementary frameworks and tools in lab processes, whose respective role may depend on aspiration and context. We end the paper by providing a series of key considerations in furthering the comparative analytical framework and its application in practice. They orient around the three guiding questions on the why's, what's, and how's of doing comparative research on sustainability transition arenas and labs across their processes, effects and impacts.

backcasting

impact evaluation

sustainability transformations

transition lab

multi-level perspective

energy transition

Författare

Johan Holmén

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Stephen Williams

IASS Potsdam

John Holmberg

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Energy Research and Social Science

2214-6296 (eISSN)

Vol. 89

Drivkrafter

Hållbar utveckling

Innovation och entreprenörskap

Ämneskategorier

Tvärvetenskapliga studier

Övrig annan teknik

Energisystem

Styrkeområden

Energi

DOI

10.1016/j.erss.2022.102522

Mer information

Skapat

2022-04-20