Driving Behavior and Safety Targets: A Naturalistic Perspective
Doktorsavhandling, 2026

Road crashes are a major cause of deaths and serious injuries worldwide. New technologies can reduce their number and severity by supporting drivers with advanced driver assistance systems (ADASs), and by taking over the entire driving task—at least under certain conditions—with automated driving systems (ADSs). Virtual simulation is one of the methods for predicting how safe these systems will be once they are released on public roads. However, ensuring that this method provides meaningful and representative results remains challenging. Safety targets are required to ensure that ADAS and ADS assessments are effective, relevant, and fair and that the systems have a positive impact on safety. This thesis focuses on the foundations for formulating and assessing these safety targets, with the aim of supporting the development of ADSs and ADASs, and ultimately improving traffic safety.
The work addresses four main aspects of safety targets. First, the thesis investigates the impact of data selection on the outcomes of virtual safety assessment. The findings indicate that crashes artificially generated from these data can differ substantially from real-world crashes, leading to lower severity outcomes, reduced criticality, and inaccurate benefit estimations. Second, the thesis evaluates the safety performance of the reference models described in UN Regulation No. 157 to determine whether they represent adequate safety targets for ADSs. A comparison of the models’ responses to those of real drivers in safety-critical scenarios reveals that the models do not perform like the competent and careful drivers they are intended to represent. Third, the thesis analyzes lane-changing behavior and its relation to the surrounding driving context. The results describe characteristics of lane-changing behavior that can be used in modeling, including a modified definition of lane-change initiation that incorporates a lateral speed threshold (in addition to the lateral position threshold used to define lane changes in current reference driver models). Finally, the thesis investigates the link between off-road glance behavior and crash risk for car-following scenarios. In line with previous literature, our results suggest that drivers adapt only modestly to time gap-related crash risk, yet they reduce both the frequency and duration of off‑road glances as time to collision gets shorter.
The findings highlight issues in current regulatory behavior model-based safety targets and the challenges that current reference models face, both in their formulation and in the data and methods used to assess safety target validity. Moreover, the findings also suggest that using observed behavior as the sole basis for safety targets for ADASs is problematic, although including components such as urgency and glance behavior may improve their performance and relevance. Overall, the results highlight the importance of ensuring relevant and valid virtual safety assessments through a well-considered choice of data sources and the robust and accurate representation of safety targets through driver models.

safety targets

glance behavior

reference driver model

counterfactual simulations

virtual safety assessment

Virtual Development Lab, Chalmers Tvärgata 4C
Opponent: Assoc. Prof. Simeon Calvert, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Författare

Pierluigi Olleja

Chalmers, Mekanik och maritima vetenskaper, Fordonssäkerhet

Validation of human benchmark models for automated driving system approval: How competent and careful are they really?

Accident Analysis and Prevention,;Vol. 213(2025)

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Analysis of Time-to-Lane-Change-Initiation Using Realistic Driving Data

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,;Vol. 25(2024)p. 4620-4633

Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift

Olleja, P., Svärd, M., Zhao, M., Bärgman, J. Analysis of the safety impact of off-road glances in car-following driving scenarios.

Svärd, M., Olleja, P., Bärgman, J. Drivers’ glance-behavior adaptation in response to looming during car-following.

Road crashes remain a pressing global concern, but the rapid evolution of advanced driver assistance systems (ADASs) and automated driving systems (ADSs) promises a safer future. However, before we can trust these technologies to take the wheel, we must answer a critical question: How do we build ADASs and ADSs that behave safely enough in the real world? Since we cannot wait for crashes to happen on public roads to test the systems, the automotive industry relies on virtual simulations to predict their safety performance.
This thesis investigates human behavior models for use in the assessment and development of ADASs and ADSs, through the analysis and formulation of safety targets. For example, we expect an automated car to drive at least as well as a "competent and careful" human. Yet, this research reveals that our current digital measuring sticks are often flawed.
By analyzing data from real-world naturalistic driving, this work shows that simulating severe crashes using data from normal driving creates a false sense of security. These artificial events often lack the urgency of real accidents, which can lead systems to appear more capable in simulations than they might be on the road. Furthermore, when current regulatory models were tested against real human behavior, they fell short, sometimes reacting too late and other times behaving with unrealistic caution.
This thesis also analyses aspects of driver behavior, such as how drivers adapt their visual attention when traffic becomes dangerous, in order to develop better ADASs and ADSs safety targets. The findings suggest that humans do not simply follow a static set of rules; they adapt to risk in complex ways. To ensure future mobility is safe, we must adopt rigorous, data-driven safety targets that accurately reflect this complexity.

Kvantitativt utforma och optimera användarupplevelsen vid konflikthantering i ADS och DAS (QUADRARUM)

FFI - Fordonsstrategisk forskning och innovation (2025-00834), 2025-08-01 -- 2028-07-31.

Improved quantitative driver behavior models and safety assessment methods for ADAS and AD (QUADRIS)

VINNOVA (2020-05156), 2021-04-01 -- 2024-03-31.

Styrkeområden

Transport

Ämneskategorier (SSIF 2025)

Transportteknik och logistik

Farkost och rymdteknik

DOI

10.63959/chalmers.dt/5837

ISBN

978-91-8103-380-9

Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola. Ny serie: 5837

Utgivare

Chalmers

Virtual Development Lab, Chalmers Tvärgata 4C

Opponent: Assoc. Prof. Simeon Calvert, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2026-03-02