Policy-driven growth of technologies to accelerate climate action
Reviewartikel, 2026

More than 70% of climate policies target low-carbon technologies, with hopes that policy support will trigger tipping points and self-reinforcing growth. In practice, however, trajectories of policy-driven technologies remain difficult to explain and anticipate because their growth is nonlinear and often constrained by backlash, policy reversals and systemic barriers. In this Perspective, we develop a framework to explain, diagnose, and anticipate the growth of policy-driven technologies through four phases. In the formative phase, rapid innovation, uncertainties and frequent failures lead to erratic growth; in the accelerating growth phase, increasing economic and political returns progressively increase deployment speed; in the steady growth phase, emerging barriers dampen acceleration leading to a pattern in which growth pulsates around its peak; and in the slowdown phase, barriers stall growth and technology reaches its limits. Surprisingly, the scale and complexity of supporting policies do not necessarily diminish as technologies mature. Effective acceleration requires phase-specific policies to support technical and commercial viability in the formative phase, amplify increasing returns in the accelerating growth phase, manage barriers in the steady growth phase, and withdraw or reinvigorate support during the slowdown phase. Further advancing this phase-aware understanding of the co-evolution of policy and technology is essential for improving climate policy design and for developing more realistic technology projections and climate mitigation scenarios.

Författare

Jessica Jewell

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Aleh Cherp

Közép-Európai Egyetem

Lunds universitet

Frank W. Geels

University of Manchester

Masahiro Suzuki

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Lola Nacke

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Jale Tosun

Universität Heidelberg

Universitetet i Oslo

Senjuty Bhowmik

Közép-Európai Egyetem

Tsimafei Kazlou

Universitetet i Bergen

Avi Jakhmola

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

Vadim Vinichenko

Chalmers, Rymd-, geo- och miljövetenskap, Fysisk resursteori

NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT

2662-138X (eISSN)

Vol. In Press

Ämneskategorier (SSIF 2025)

Geovetenskap och relaterad miljövetenskap

DOI

10.1038/s43017-026-00765-3

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2026-03-27