Policy-driven growth of technologies to accelerate climate action
Review article, 2026

More than 70% of climate policies target low-carbon technologies, with hopes that policy support will trigger tipping points and self-reinforcing growth. In practice, however, trajectories of policy-driven technologies remain difficult to explain and anticipate because their growth is nonlinear and often constrained by backlash, policy reversals and systemic barriers. In this Perspective, we develop a framework to explain, diagnose, and anticipate the growth of policy-driven technologies through four phases. In the formative phase, rapid innovation, uncertainties and frequent failures lead to erratic growth; in the accelerating growth phase, increasing economic and political returns progressively increase deployment speed; in the steady growth phase, emerging barriers dampen acceleration leading to a pattern in which growth pulsates around its peak; and in the slowdown phase, barriers stall growth and technology reaches its limits. Surprisingly, the scale and complexity of supporting policies do not necessarily diminish as technologies mature. Effective acceleration requires phase-specific policies to support technical and commercial viability in the formative phase, amplify increasing returns in the accelerating growth phase, manage barriers in the steady growth phase, and withdraw or reinvigorate support during the slowdown phase. Further advancing this phase-aware understanding of the co-evolution of policy and technology is essential for improving climate policy design and for developing more realistic technology projections and climate mitigation scenarios.

Author

Jessica Jewell

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

Aleh Cherp

Central European University

Lund University

Frank W. Geels

University of Manchester

Masahiro Suzuki

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

Lola Nacke

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

Jale Tosun

Heidelberg University

University of Oslo

Senjuty Bhowmik

Central European University

Tsimafei Kazlou

University of Bergen

Avi Jakhmola

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

Vadim Vinichenko

Chalmers, Space, Earth and Environment, Physical Resource Theory

NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT

2662-138X (eISSN)

Vol. In Press

Subject Categories (SSIF 2025)

Earth and Related Environmental Sciences

DOI

10.1038/s43017-026-00765-3

More information

Latest update

3/27/2026