“Good Prompts are Sufficient to Produce Good Written Products ✨ Effective Use of Generative AI in Writing Requires Critical AI Literacy”
Kapitel i bok, 2026

The internet abounds with resources promising effortless academic writing through generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), positioning prompt engineering as a shortcut to producing high-quality texts. This chapter challenges that assumption. Framing writing as a technical problem with a technical solution perpetuates a reductive view of writing as a product to be manufactured, rather than a complex social and cognitive process of meaning-making. Students who adopt this plug-and-play approach risk bypassing the challenging but essential work of thought development, undermining both their learning and their identities as writers. To address this, we propose Critical GenAI Literacy (C-GAI-L) as a key component of academic writing instruction in higher education. Grounded in metacognitive awareness and self-regulated learning, C-GAI-L equips students to engage responsibly and effectively with GenAI while remaining the primary agents of their own thinking and writing.

self-regulated learning

generative AI

metacognition

critical AI literacy

academic writing

Författare

Sindija Franzetti

Chalmers, Vetenskapens kommunikation och lärande, Fackspråk och kommunikation

Amy Wanyu Ou

Göteborgs universitet

Bad Ideas about AI and Writing: Generative Practices for Teaching, Learning, and Communication

79-85
978-1-64215-277-7 (ISBN)

Utformning och förbättring av en mikroläroplan om kritisk generativ AI för doktorander

Chalmers (C 2024-0448), 2024-03-25 -- 2025-06-01.

Ämneskategorier (SSIF 2025)

Utbildningsvetenskap

DOI

10.37514/PER-B.2026.2777.2.10

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2026-08-20