Are crash causation studies the best way to understand system failures – Who can we blame?
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2024
In prevention, we have for decades been more inclined to look for systematic improvements of all elements of the road transport system, and we direct the recommendations for actions towards system designers, organizations, products and services.
In this paper the discussion about causation and prevention is broadened in the light of Vision Zero and its approach to prevention of serious and fatal injuries. We also discuss the Swedish judicial system and why the prevention approach has not been legislated or even generally accepted. Occupational health and safety legislation and road rules are compared, as well as how sustainability practices and reporting are tools to apply prevention where organizations have a natural sphere of influence that could mitigate deaths and serious injuries within value chains.
It is recommended that we stop using the term causation as it is only directing actions in one direction. There is a risk that the focus on causation, in particular single causes, will deviate actions away from robust prevention countermeasures such as increased seat belt use, relevant speed limits, and well functioning roundabouts and median barriers. Furthermore, there is also a risk that important preventative actions from organizations are overlooked.
Fatal crash classification
Vision Zero
Injury prevention
Safety performance indicators
Road traffic crashes
Crash causation
Författare
Anders Lie
Chalmers, Mekanik och maritima vetenskaper, Fordonsteknik och autonoma system
Claes Tingvall
Chalmers, Mekanik och maritima vetenskaper, Fordonssäkerhet
Accident Analysis and Prevention
0001-4575 (ISSN)
Vol. 196 107432Drivkrafter
Hållbar utveckling
Styrkeområden
Transport
Hälsa och teknik
Ämneskategorier
Filosofi
Övrig annan teknik
Företagsekonomi
Farkostteknik
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi
DOI
10.1016/j.aap.2023.107432
PubMed
38163388