Insights from Energy Systems Optimization Models and Stakeholders Engagement – A Multi-Scale and Cross-Sectoral Perspective on Low-Carbon Transport Systems
Doktorsavhandling, 2026

While energy transition literature often describes such a transition as a context-specific process, this perspective is frequently overlooked in studies of low-carbon transport systems. This thesis addresses this research gap, by developing a single analytical framework that considers (i) a multi‑scale perspective; (ii) cross‑sectoral interactions; and (iii) a continuous soft‑link between energy systems optimization models (ESOMs) and stakeholders engagement. The framework considers local (urban and non‑urban), national, and global scales, and examines low‑carbon transport transition under both exogenous and endogenous cross‑sectoral perspectives.

The results show that low‑carbon transport pathways are context-dependent, varying not only across spatial scales, but also socio‑geographical contexts. For passenger cars, all scenarios converge toward increased electrification in the long term; however, the pace and cost‑optimal technology pathways are influenced by travel behavior, infrastructure availability, and policy constraints. A multi‑scale perspective further reveals that aggregated national results tend to reflect urban dynamics, potentially overlooking non‑urban transport systems’ dynamics.

Adopting a cross‑sectoral perspective demonstrates that transport transitions are shaped by systems‑wide interactions rather than transport‑specific dynamics alone. Results from the global and endogenous modeling framework highlight how system‑integrators (e.g., electricity, biomass, carbon capture technologies, and co-products availability) govern the allocation of resources and the timing of transition across sectors. Sectors with higher mitigation flexibility, often associated with greater electrification potential (e.g., heat and road transport), tend to transition earlier, thereby relaxing systems-wide constraints and allowing hard‑to‑abate sectors, particularly aviation, to transition more gradually. The findings further show that the role of liquid fuels as sustainable aviation fuels is strongly dependent on carbon budgets, biomass availability, and carbon storage capacity, reflecting cross‑sectoral trade‑offs and synergies.

Soft-linking stakeholders engagement with ESOMs enhances the contextual relevance and legitimacy of modeling formulation. By incorporating a socio‑technical dimension, this analytical link strengthens the representation of modeling assumptions, supports scenario development, facilitates mutual learning between modelers and decision‑making stakeholders as well as technical experts. Accordingly, this thesis demonstrates that such a continuous interaction might provide a more robust and realistic understanding of low‑carbon transport systems. Hence this thesis contributes to ESOMs scholarly by moving beyond “one‑size‑fits‑all” approaches into more transparent, context‑sensitive, and decision‑relevant analyses applicable not only to transport systems but to broader energy transitions.

Socio-Technical Systems

Socio-Geographical Contexts

Stakeholders Engagement

Cost-Optimization Models

Multi-Scale Perspective

Low-Carbon Transport

Cross-Sectoral Perspective

HB3 Online password rE2qr7sR
Opponent: Lars J Nilsson, Lund University

Författare

Maria de Oliveira Laurin

Chalmers, Mekanik och maritima vetenskaper, Maritima studier

de Oliveira Laurin, M., Rådberg, H., Grahn, M., Tiwari, S., Brynolf, S. Cost-Effective Fuel Pathways for Aviation under Varying Carbon Reduction Targets: The Cross-Sectoral Role of Biomass Availability in Global Energy Systems

How can we make transport systems more climate-friendly, and why do solutions vary in different places? This thesis explores these questions by studying how carbon dioxide emissions from transport can be reduced when assuming different climate targets, technologies, society developments, and geographical scale.

The research combines three key ideas. First, it looks at transport from different geographical scales, ranging from rural areas and large cities to national and global levels. Second, it examines how transport interacts with other parts of the energy system, such as electricity, heating, and industry. Third, it brings together computer-based energy models with insights from real-world stakeholders, including policymakers and technical experts.

The findings show that there is no single best pathway to low‑carbon transport. What works in a city may not work in rural areas, and global trends can differ from national ones. For example, electric cars are likely to dominate in the long run, but how quickly this happens depends on travel habits, infrastructure, and policy decisions. Currently, national-level analyses often reflect urban conditions, and this thesis shows that such an approach may overlook the specific needs for people living in rural areas.

The thesis also shows that transport cannot be understood in isolation. It is part of a wider energy system. It is expected that different sectors, e.g., electricity, heating, and transport, will compete for the same climate-friendly resources when replacing fossil fuels. The upper limit on how much emissions can be emitted to avoid global warming as well as how to best use resources, e.g., electricity, biomass, carbon capture technologies, and co-products when producing fuels for transport, influence how and when change will happen. Sectors that can replace fossil fuels more easily can help other sectors where it is more costly and technically difficult to reduce emissions, like aviation. This means that climate targets can be met even if aviation replaces fossil fuels at a much slower pace than other sectors.

By involving stakeholders, this thesis makes sure the analysis reflects real-world conditions, and not just theory. This also helps make the results more relevant and easier to understand. Overall, the thesis shows that designing climate-friendly transport systems requires flexible, approaches, adjusted for different circumstances, rather than “one-size-fits-all” solutions. Hence this thesis provides a new way to better understand and support the transition to more green transport as well as a more sustainable energy system.

Sustainable Mobility Rural and Urban Transport (SMaRT)

Interreg (NYPS20203416), 2020-01-01 -- 2022-09-30.

Transformativ omställning mot nettonegativa utsläpp inom svensk raffinaderi- och kemiindustri

Energimyndigheten (P2019-90070), 2020-07-01 -- 2025-06-30.

Drivkrafter

Hållbar utveckling

Styrkeområden

Transport

Energi

Ämneskategorier (SSIF 2025)

Transportteknik och logistik

Energisystem

DOI

10.63959/chalmers.dt/5911

ISBN

978-91-8103-454-7

Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers tekniska högskola. Ny serie: 5911

Utgivare

Chalmers

HB3 Online password rE2qr7sR

Online

Opponent: Lars J Nilsson, Lund University

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2026-07-31