Corporate-internal vs. national standard – A comparison study of two ergonomics evaluation procedures used in automotive manufacturing
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2009

Manufacturing corporations sometimes use corporate-internal procedures to evaluate and monitor the ergonomic status of the workplace. This article describes an industrial case study in the Swedish automotive sector, where an internally developed evaluation procedure was compared with a procedure based on a Swedish national standard provision. It was found that the national standard procedure tended to give more severe ratings and statistical support shows that the two evaluation procedures are not equivalent. The ability of the methods to identify body segments at risk was also compared. The quantitative comparison was followed up with interviews, where the influence of professional tasks and objectives became evident, as well as the fact that evaluation criteria are quantified differently by the two procedures. The main finding is that unforeseen differences in analysis procedure, criteria of acceptability and levels of detail can cause use-related difficulties for different professional groups when methods are used interchangeably.

Comparison case study

National ergonomics standards

Automotive manufacturing

Ergonomics evaluation methods

Physical ergonomics

Production ergonomics

Författare

Cecilia Berlin

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktionssystem

Roland Örtengren

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktionssystem

Dan Lämkull

Chalmers, Produkt- och produktionsutveckling, Produktionssystem

Lars Hanson

Lunds universitet

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

0169-8141 (ISSN)

Vol. 39 6 940-946

Ämneskategorier

Produktionsteknik, arbetsvetenskap och ergonomi

Annan maskinteknik

DOI

10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.005

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2018-03-02