The geosystem services concept – What is it and can it support subsurface planning?
Review article, 2022

The subsurface is a multifunctional natural resource. However, a mindset of “out of sight, out of mind” and a first-come-first-served principle are prevalent when accessing these resources, compromising fair intergenerational and intragenerational distribution and sustainable development. As with the ecosystem services (ES) concept, which acknowledges the contribution of the living part of nature to human well-being, the concept of geosystem services (GS) has been suggested as a way to highlight abiotic services and services provided by the subsurface. The overall aim of this study was to review current definitions of GS and their categorisation, and to suggest how the concept of GS can support subsurface planning. A systematic literature review on GS was carried out following the PRISMA protocol drawing from the Scopus database. The emerging picture from the reviewed articles is that the GS concept is both one of novelty and one currently showing inconsistency, with two prominent definitions: A) GS are abiotic services that are the direct result of the planet's geodiversity, independent of the interactions with biotic nature – there is no differentiation between suprasurface and subsurface features, and B) GS provide benefits specifically resulting from the subsurface. Thirty-one out of thirty-nine GS listed in the reviewed literature are included in the abiotic extension of the common ES framework CICES v5.1, but some essential services are omitted. A unified definition of GS is desirable to build a common framework for classifying and describing GS, potentially following the CICES structure for ES. Such a framework can support systematic inclusion of GS in planning processes and contribute to improved subsurface planning. In planning practice, there are examples of important GS that are already included under the ES umbrella because planners are aware of their importance but a comprehensive framework to handle these services is lacking.

Planning

Geosystem services

Urban underground space

Abiotic services

Ecosystem services

Geodiversity

Author

Emrik Lundin Frisk

Geologi

Yevheniya Volchko

Geologi

Olof Taromi Sandström

Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU)

T. Soderqvist

Holmboe & Skarp AB

Lars O Ericsson

Chalmers, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Geology and Geotechnics

Fredrik Mossmark

Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU)

Andreas Lindhe

Geologi

Göran Blom

Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

Lars Ove Lång

Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU)

Christel Carlsson

Swedish Geotechnical Institute (SGI)

Jenny Norrman

Geologi

Ecosystem Services

2212-0416 (ISSN)

Vol. 58 101493

Geosystemtjänster - beskrivning och värdering av undermarkens resusrser som ett verktyg i samhällsplaneringen

J. Gust. Richert stiftelse (dnr2019-00563), 2019-07-01 -- 2022-08-31.

Novel subsurface thematic representations to support planning and valuation

Geological Survey of Sweden (SGU) (36-1341/2019), 2020-03-01 -- 2023-12-31.

BeFo - Rock engineering research foundation, 2020-03-01 -- 2023-12-31.

Driving Forces

Sustainable development

Subject Categories

Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Information Science

Information Systemes, Social aspects

DOI

10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101493

More information

Latest update

10/25/2023