Environmental assessment of additive manufacturing in the automotive industry
Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, 2019

3D-printing, also known as Additive Manufacturing (AM), is an emerging technology with suggested potential to decrease environmental impactsin the manufacturing industry. Potential benefits from implementing the technology include reduced product weight, transportation and material losses, as well as improved functionality and possibility for printing of spare parts. Possible drawbacks are increased energy use in production and the slow printing process. As the technology is expected to grow significantly, it is important to assess potential environmental effects of implementation. In this study a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used in the case of Powder Bed Fusion (PBF) of the metal parts of an engine in a light distribution truck. Conventional manufacturing is compared to scenarios with 3D-printing, one representing the present state of development of 3D-printing technology and one representing a possible future state. The results show that, in the future case, PBF potentially improves life cycle environmental performance by redesigning components for weight reduction. However, a clean electricity source was required as well as technological development allowing for printing of large components, with low-impact raw materials. When instead assessing AM in its present state of development, results showed only moderate or negligible environmental improvements. To achieve the future potential environmental benefits from AM it is important to use clean electricity and to develop the technology to be able to use low-impact feedstock materials such as low-alloy steel (avoiding materials based on e.g. nickel). Industries implementing AM should seek to exploit the benefits of the technology, such as weight reduction and functionality improvements as well as the potential offered for printing spare parts for remanufacturing and repairing.

Powder bed fusion

3D-printing

Truck engine

Selective laser melting

Life cycle assessment

Metal additive manufacturing

Författare

Daniel Böckin

Chalmers, Teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Miljösystemanalys

Anne-Marie Tillman

Chalmers, Teknikens ekonomi och organisation, Miljösystemanalys

Journal of Cleaner Production

0959-6526 (ISSN)

Vol. 226 977-987

Mistra REES – Resource-Efficient and Effective Solutions

Stiftelsen för miljöstrategisk forskning (Mistra), 2016-01-01 -- 2019-12-31.

Drivkrafter

Hållbar utveckling

Styrkeområden

Produktion

Ämneskategorier

Miljöledning

Miljövetenskap

DOI

10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.086

Mer information

Senast uppdaterat

2019-07-22